“People do not lack strength,
they lack will.” – Victor Hugo
Hello all. Welcome back to
The Disciplinary Couple’s Club. Our
weekly on-line gathering of men and women who are in, or would like to be in, a
Domestic Discipline relationship. I hope
you all had a great week.
Mine was about what I expected. A solid week spent in a conference room with
a set of work colleagues, book-ended with lots of travel. In some ways, it was a good exercise in a
team of people working toward a common goal.
Yet, it also illustrated perfectly some of the themes we talk about on
this blog regarding communications. Lots
of dancing around the elephants in the room.
Lots of hard issues addressed with long, ambling, indirect, veiled
communications in which the desire to avoid giving offense got in the way of saying
what we really thought. As I mulled through where these indirect and
polite-to-a-fault communications left us after a week, coincidentally there were comments taking place on the blog that also focused on how communication style impacts the effectiveness of the message. First,
there was this from Arthur:
"I must say that my
confidence in my opinion and judgment has gotten me a long way in the business
world, and I will never give that up. Sometimes that comes off as arrogance
when it really is not. What my wife and I consider to be arrogant is when I get
sarcastic and condescending about the opinions of others. This tends to happen
at work in long meetings that ramble on even though what we need to do is
painfully clear. I really dislike these unnecessary discussions and will
eventually cut them off with a stinging comment or two.”
My, oh my how Arthur’s
description of “rambling on” in situations where what needs to be done is
painfully clear resonated with me last week.
And, he ended with another point that sets up an interesting
contrast. “That lack of patience results
in a stinging butt for me!” In contrast
to the inefficient and ineffective exchanges that characterize so many
of our discussions at work and with others, in Domestic Discipline
relationships the wives have been empowered to communicate in a way that cuts
right to the chase and leaves no doubt about their views, leaving nothing open to interpretation! And, isn’t that communication style so much
more effective?
It wasn’t only Arthur’s
comments that linked (expressly or implicitly) a given communication style and the
likelihood the recipient will really get the message. Alan observed:
“One other thing about
consistency that goes beyond the obvious: her consistency on a given behavior
or any behavior for that matter underscores how important it is to her that a
behavior (or attitude) be changed/modified. I find that makes a big difference
to me if she is adamant about it and seems very committed to changing that
behavior. Her emotional investment in discipline has a huge impact on me and
how I behave.”
TB closed out the week’s
discussions with this:
“The few times that I have
been punished whilst she has still been angry have been the most memorable and
most effective. That is not to say that the (many) other times have not hurt or
been severe but there is something about the naked emotion applied via the
strap whilst the offense is still (virtually) ringing in ours ears that make
those times so very real.”
Whether the topic was correcting
bad behavior at work, immediate versus delayed punishment, or the importance of
consistency, the common thread among these comments was how timing, tone and
displays of determination affect the quality of communication and the
effectiveness of getting the point across.
It was clear that some of us, sometimes, are on the receiving end of a verbal or non-verbal message that makes it clear that future bad behavior better not happen or that the consequences for such repeat behavior will be something we really, really want to avoid.
It was clear that some of us, sometimes, are on the receiving end of a verbal or non-verbal message that makes it clear that future bad behavior better not happen or that the consequences for such repeat behavior will be something we really, really want to avoid.
I would like to use this part of Alan’s comment as the launching point for this week’s discussion:
“I find that makes a big difference to me if she is adamant about it and seems
very committed to changing that behavior.”
The topic reduces to the role that
determination, tone and displays of will have in really modifying
behavior.
Are there some behaviors the wives are really committed to changing? How is that commitment and determination conveyed?
Are there some behaviors the wives are really committed to changing? How is that commitment and determination conveyed?
Wives, do you openly tell him about your level of determination and commitment
to change a particular behavior? Tell
us about those conversations.
Do tone of voice and the way you project your authority also play a role in
conveying your determination? How does
your tone of voice, your demeanor, your body language and all those “non-verbal” aspects of
communication or, to be more precise, those elements beyond the words
themselves, display your determination to really change a particular behavior?
What about your demeanor after a spanking? Can that convey a message about your level of determination to bring about real change?
Are there other things that
distinguish those times when you really want to root out a behavior? Does the consistency or timing of discipline
change? Do you multiply the number of
spankings or impose other, non-spanking punishments?
And, what about times when
discipline fails to bring about real change?
Do you think it is perhaps because there is a lack of real will or
determination to make him change?
What could be done to turn that around and make him feel like he really
must change this behavior, or else?
































