“Reasonable orders are easy enough to obey; it is capricious, bureaucratic or plain idiotic demands that form the habit of discipline.” - Barbara W. Tuchman
Hello all. Welcome back to The Disciplinary Couple’s Club. Our weekly on-line gathering of men and women who are in, or would like to be in, a Domestic Discipline relationship.
I hope you all had a good week. Mine was pretty sedate. Although it’s still August, I’m detecting a whiff of autumn in the air. There are even a few trees in the early stages of turning yellow.
Although I’m a little sad to see motorcycle
season winding down with several contemplated trips left untaken, I’m kind of
in the mood for a seasonal change. It’s likely
to be an unadventurous fall, as I’ve been putting off some surgery to repair an
injury from last summer, and it feels like it’s time to get it done, even though the recuperation process is kind of going to suck.
Although my week was easygoing as a whole, it got started with a bang. After a summer that passed with surprisingly little disciplinary action, on Monday I got a somewhat surprising, and surprisingly hard, spanking.
The surprise was really about the timing. I reported on this to this group, including this text making her intention clear, in my August 11, 2025 post.
A full week had gone by with no further mention of it. In typical Disciplined Husband fashion, I felt relieved but also disappointed at what seemed to be developing into another instance of inconsistent enforcement and “punishment delayed is punishment denied.” So, I was a little bit surprised when, on Monday, she announced that it was time for my bottom to pay the price for something that had truly pissed her off.
Part of me was glad for the follow-through. That feeling lasted until the first few swats with her bath brush. It was really, truly excruciating.
It’s yet another reason why delayed punishment is a problem. I do want consistency for its own sake. I think we both embody this whole lifestyle more deeply and effectively when punishment naturally and predictably follows bad behavior, particularly if she’s actually told me that I will be punished. But, it’s also in my butt’s interest that punishment happens fairly regularly if it is going to happen at all, because the spankings that come after a substantial period in which discipline slips simply hurt way, way more!
So, that’s one topic for this week: Have you experienced the phenomenon in which spankings hurt way worse if there is a long time between them? If so, is that additional pain enough to make you prefer being spanked more regularly?
Another topic raised by this incident is spankings we don’t agree with. In previous posts raising the issue, I’ve labeled these “undeserved” spankings, but that label could be a bit misleading in some situations. Including, perhaps the spanking I received this week.
As I related in the post a couple of weeks ago, the incident that got me spanked involved throwing away some boxes for some electronic gadgets Anne had bought. She had left the empty boxes in a dresser, in a room that doesn’t have enough available storage. I wanted to put some clothes in that drawer, so I threw the boxes out. As luck would have it, a few weeks later one of the units seemed to be failing. Anne had left a charger that came with the gadgets in one of the boxes, and I apparently threw it away, not noticing that it was in the box. So, when Anne went to recharge and reset the gadget, there was no charger and no instructions.
As the text above demonstrates, she was livid. Why? Well, her stated reason was the missing charger and instructions.
The real reason is almost certainly that this is an ongoing battle between us, with Anne having a reluctance to throw things out that approaches (in my opinion) a hoarding disorder, while she thinks it’s presumptuous, arrogant, and (in this case) careless of me to throw away “her” stuff without asking.
So, did I “deserve” the spanking I got? It’s debatable on one level, though maybe not on another.
In terms of the substance,
was I careless in not noticing I was throwing out a charger with the boxes? Perhaps,
though it was kind of “no harm, no foul”, as it’s not like we don’t have a
plethora of USB-C charging cords laying around, and instructions are easy to
find on-line. And, the plain fact is
that asking Anne to throw things out is often futile, so if I want clutter out
of the house, I have to toss it myself, often banking on the fact she won’t notice. While I see that as a justification, she sees it as part and parcel of the problem.
In many cases where we’ve had a disagreement and she’s spanked me, I somehow “saw the light” by the end of the spanking, literally coming around to her perspective on whatever it was that got me in trouble. Did that happen in this case? Not really.
I still believe that the
boxes should have been thrown out, and I think it is fair to observe that I
didn’t ask permission precisely because when I do ask, she almost always
comes up with some reason why something has to be kept or, better yet,
"donated", which really means it moves from one part of our house to
a staging area for taking it to a donation center, then it stays there for
weeks or months. Basically, me throwing things out without asking is in direct reaction
to her undermining efforts to throw them out at all. Again, I see that as justification; she sees it as the problem.
So, in one respect, we disagree on whether the spanking was "deserved".
Yet, in another sense, we don't. If you treat disobedience itself as spankable, independent of the objective rightness or wrongness of the underlying conduct, then I clearly did deserve one, because I do know how she feels about me throwing things out, and chose to ignore it. I ran the risk of doing something I know she gets angry about, I got caught, and my ass paid the price.
Honestly, it speaks well of Anne’s judgment that, over the course of twenty-plus years of Domestic Discipline, I can't think of a circumstance where I have been punished for something I really didn't do or something that I didn't know in advance was a problem for her.
There have been a few other cases in which I didn’t fully agree with the premise underlying her decision to spank. And, there have been a few times when a spanking was harder than I expected, given the nature of the offense. Admittedly, those times left me feeling at best unsettled and, at worst, somewhat resentful, as I pulled by pants up over my very sore bottom.
However, in virtually all
those cases, there was an offsetting increase in the respect I felt for her and
her disciplinary authority. I have a similar reaction to her spanking for something because it was an act of disobedience, regardless of my attempts to justify it.
Spanking for disobedience—independent of any agreement on the rules—probably moves us a little further over whatever the line is that separates DD from FLR. It’s hard to deny she is increasingly in charge of the relationship if the standard for whether something is spankable comes down to, “Because I said so.”
I'm OK with that. When I first discovered The Disciplinary Wives Club and became instantly obsessed, I recognized from the beginning that I had an attraction to the idea of being held accountable for bad behavior.
I also think that I had some awareness that I was most fascinated by stories where the discipline--and sometimes the entire disciplinary relationship--were imposed regardless of the husband's views on the matter.
What I don't think I appreciated much at all at that time was that DD was attractive to me not just because of the accountability aspect but, independently, because of the raw exercise of power and authority, i.e. by the the wives' insistence on obedience. I knew I desired discipline; I've come to learn I also desire to be made to obey.
There's another reason I'm OK with her spanking for disobedience regardless of whether I think the underlying conduct makes it objectively "fair": Her being overly concerned about “fairness” is one of the sources of the inconsistency that so many of us complain about.
When I addressed the topic of “undeserved”
spankings a few years ago, Alan had this comment:
My wife is an experienced disciplinarian who had experienced both sides of the brush, but the woman who introduced me to adult spanking was not so experienced. Early on in our relationship she was somewhat "hung up" on the idea of fairness, until it sometimes paralyzed her, preventing her from administering discipline that was badly needed. The notion of fairness was very important to her at the same time inhibiting her from doing what she knew was needed.
I see that in my wife, too. Too often, instead of ordering a spanking when she thinks it is deserved, she’ll ask something like, “Do you need a spanking for that?” or she’ll make a statement that’s really a question about her own authority, like: “Maybe you should get spanked for that next time.” It’s like she’s opening a negotiation regarding the scope of her authority, even though we’ve agreed many, many times that making ALL decisions regarding what should be punished is within her authority.
How does this work in your DD relationship? Is disobedience spankable in and of itself? Do the wives worry about “fairness”? Do they maybe worry about it too much? How much does your agreement about the underlying premise for the spanking affect whether it happens?
I hope you have a great week. FYI, I have an out-of-town event this upcoming weekend, so I may post later in the week.
To take your first question first, I’ve always seen it as a drop in my tolerance after an extended gap, rather than an increase in pain, but I guess it really amounts to the same thing - she doesn’t have to work as hard to get the desired effect. The second part is a bit more complex, I particularly picked up your point about DD heading towards the line separating it from FLR. I’ve always had some difficulty understanding that line and I think your discussion of simple disobedience clarifies it nicely. When we do or say some that is hurtful or damaging in some way, we get spanked for it. However, if there can be simple disobedience, that implies she has authority to make decisions across the board, which I guess is FLR. I think this defines us pretty clearly as not being FLR. She doesn’t make rules that I have to follow, instead we have more of a partnership where decisions are made together rather than unilaterally. I think the reason that I’ve always had a problem with this definition is that there are certain areas where she definitely leads (as well as some where I tend to lead.) Finance is an obvious example. That’s her field and she is much better at it than I am, but even then she’ll run every decision past me first and we’ll discuss it, even though in almost all cases I will agree that the end result is whatever she decided to start with. So I guess where I end up is that the “L” in FLR implies her making decisions alone, without necessarily having consultation and agreement, in which case disagreeing with those decisions can be regarded as disobedience, and therefore punishable. But with the style of relationship we have, that’s pretty much a null concept. She still has authority to spank whenever SHE thinks it’s justified; and to stay with the financial, we have long agreed that - for example - late paying a credit card and thereby incurring unnecessary interest charges, is spankable, but I’d see this as doing something (or failing to do something) against a mutually agreed rule and not as disobedience. I suppose I’d say that for us, “because I say so” isn’t in the lexicon. TG
ReplyDelete"I particularly picked up your point about DD heading towards the line separating it from FLR. I’ve always had some difficulty understanding that line and I think your discussion of simple disobedience clarifies it nicely."
DeleteYeah, I think a clear line probably is impossible to draw. There are just too many variables and individual couple dynamics. For me, an FLR doesn't mean, or doesn't have to mean, that she is making every decision or has the authority to make the final decision in every area. I would say Anne and my relationship has some FLR aspects, but on most big day-to-day decisions we either (a) make them as partners; or (b) they're made by the person with the greater interest or knowledge in that area. For example, in your marriage your wife makes most of the Financial decisions. In mine, my wife handles all the bill paying and bank account stuff, while I handle almost all the investment decisions. We never expressly decided to divide things that way; it's just always reflected our respective interests and skills.
To me, the "L" in FLR doesn't imply making decisions alone. It stands for "Led" and to me, while that entails leading and leadership, that concept doesn't entail doing everything alone or having unfettered authority.
But, it's an inherently indistinct line. There are aspects of the DWC that would suggest the wives having a lot of power. For example, in the Tips & Methods section, it says: "The first thing you must do is to explain the golden rule of your proposed (or existing) disciplinary relationship. He must render complete obedience to you with regard to disciplinary issues at all times and must be willing to carry out any and all orders you give him without question or hesitation. The first time he refuses to obey an order you need to stop and have a serious talk with him right then and there. If the husband is allowed to dictate when he will or will not obey an order, then that leaves some question as to who is really in charge, doesn't it?"
There are blurbs in the DWC handbooks that also emphasize that she is in control and that he has an obligation to obey at all times. But, it gets murky because of qualifiers like "regarding disciplinary issues." Maybe that significantly limits the authority but, since Aunt Kay also said the wife gets to set the rules, then is there really much limit on her authority? If you asked Aunt Kay or the other wives who were involved when the DWC was a real thing, I really don't know whether they would have thought they were in an FLR. Or, another way of proposing the question might be, did they even see the two as distinguishable? Maybe they saw both the authority (FLR) and the means of enforcing it (DD) as different aspects of one single dynamic?
This topic of inconsistency and infrequency is about to hit home for me as Lauren is about to have a surgery that will require me to be home during her rehab period of about a month. I doubt She will feel like delivering Discipline during that period. I am mentally preparing to be a good, obedient and very considerate Healer. To that end She has promised a particularly long and vocal spanking session to prevent any poor behavior or underlying resentful feelings on my part as I take the position of Healer. I am a little concerned about the unavoidable power dynamic switch during the period after Her surgery as I will be taking a more leadership, take charge role and we have discussed the unavoidable power dynamic switch that will happen as I take on the role of care taker.
DeleteWe definitely have a FLR component as we have agreed that She has ultimate decision making power in our relationship(except for finances). Almost all of our decisions are made jointly from an input perspective, but as I said She has the final say after considering my point of view. I weigh in on most issues, but after I articulate my view once any further pushing is considered Argumentative and is punishable by Disciplinary Spanking.
As far as Fairness is concerned, I have only had one spanking that I thought was undeserved, but after the spanking I saw that it was deserved. We were on a trip with two other couples for about 3 weeks traveling in another country and I had a day where I was being a bit disagreeable about things that She saw as trivial. This occurred throughout the whole day and as we were going to bed in our hotel room She announced that we were having Discipline before going to sleep. The next day we were traveling and for the next week would be staying in an Air BnB situation with the other couples and She saw it as both preventative and as the last opportunity to punish for my poor attitude. I completely disagreed with the premise that I deserved it or that the preventative need was justified. The truth is I was falling in to an argumentative behavioral pattern and both the punishment aspect and preventative aspect were totally justified. I have only refused Discipline once. It was very early in our FLR/DD and it could have ended the dynamic. I did submit eventually and the beating was excruciating. We added never refusing Discipline to our Rule list and I have never even thought about refusing since.
We went through a similar surgical recovery situation last year, with me having to be in caretaker mode--which I'm not at all well-suited for--for about 10 weeks. For me, the issue that came up wasn't so much feeling like I was in charge or on top because I was (a) mobile; and (b) the one being depended on but, rather, it was tough being at someone's beck and call all day every day. Like I said, caretaker role is not something I gravitate to. Also, I feel like we've always had a fairly even, fair split when it comes to household responsibilities. Suddenly, it was 10% on me, including things I hate (grocery shopping) and/or am not good at (cooking). We got through it but, honestly, I hated every minute of it. It looks like I'm likely to have another surgery myself in a couple of months, but I'm bound and determined to be doing everything for myself as soon as humanly possible.
Delete
DeleteJackson said, “I have only refused Discipline once. It was very early in our FLR/DD, and it could have ended the dynamic. I did submit eventually, and the beating was excruciating. We added never refusing Discipline to our Rule list, and I have never even thought about refusing since.”
Jackson, I agree with the importance of not refusing discipline. Doing so in a former relationship did major damage to the relationship. (Even today, I feel remorse for doing it. ) My wife is a spanko, and we both agreed that we did not want it to happen in our relationship. If you want to GUARANTEE you will never refuse discipline again, agree that the punishment for it will be a spanking after you have ejaculated. You might do it once, but not a second time. For us, if I ever refused a spanking, it would be disciplinary defiance, and it is the one behavior we have agreed she has the authority to spank after ordering me to orgasm. (She can spank after lovemaking if she chooses, but that is part of anytime for any reason, and she has never used that authority.
Treating “disciplinary defiance this way has actually made it easier to submit to spanking. Unconsciously, I think it gives me an excuse to obey and submit because of the consequences of not doing so. It acts as a kind of circuit breaker at that critical moment when I could make a bad decision -and she can be quick to remind me why I don’t want to delay or refuse a spanking she has ordered
Alan
Alan,
DeleteWe got things over and done with before it. I only tended to spank afterwards for something that happened during it.
L.
L,
Deletewould you expand some on that? I probably need another cup of coffee, but not sure I know what you mean.
Alan
Dan,
ReplyDeleteI can relate to your situation with the late punishment scenarios of our relationship. I find my wife at times delays punishment or forgets to punish when I misbehave. Like Anne, she has used the line, “well I didn’t think about it at that moment”. My last punishment included a switching. My first in a long long time. It hurt tremendously and the stripes lasted a day or two. My wife enjoyed punishing me this way, because it took little effort on her part. This along with a strapping was quite memorable and I was sore for three days at work. To add to the above, I always felt DD was significantly different from FLR. I agree and always thought that the L meant Led. If your wife doesn’t lead in most scenarios or for that matter any, than to me, your not in an FLR. You used the scenario of finances. To me, that just means you’re better at it than she is. I’m better at finances than my wife. If I don’t have the money than I don’t buy it. I haven’t paid interest on a cc in over twenty years. We have always made big decisions together, but she will ask my opinion on things and vice versa. So for us it’s strictly DD. I’ve stated before in my twenties, I could of benefited from a moderate FLR. I’ve also had my wife state to me, keep pushing and your going to get thrashed. I’ve reiterated to her that she shouldn’t earn and I should be punished. If you feel I’ve gone that far, than a thrashing is warranted. I applauded her for actions on my last thrashing. She took the bull by the horns and I reiterated my commitment to her surrounding discipline. I think she now realizes how bad they hurt (my diminished erection) and how my behavior changes immediately after a severe thrashing. My wife still looks at me as a protector and provider, so it’s not her natural first response when I screw up. It’s taken some time and effort on her part to transition. Anyone who think that it happens overnight, is only kidding themselves. I don’t think fairness is an issue with us, as my wife should spank at times and doesn’t. To your point about throwing the boxes away. I think that you definitely did not deserve a thrashing. My wife has hoarding tendencies as well. I look at is if she’s going to thrash me for something I don’t necessarily agree with; there have been many times I should have received one and I didn’t. Did Tomy ever feel he was actually in an FLR???
T
"Did Tomy ever feel he was actually in an FLR???" I've never really asked him, but I can think of a couple of comments he made here on this blog, and a couple of stories he's told me, that suggested that not only did Aunt Kay have very substantial authority, but the wives who were in the DWC network seemed to have some authority of each other's husbands, or at least the women were very open to each other having that control. He told me about one incident in which a DWC couple from England visited them, and the wife got angry that Tomy didn't wear his seatbelt when driving them around. She asked Kay if she could cane him, and she agreed. There also are the stories on the website, like Pretty Legs II, with lines like, "Oh, and in case you didn't hear my discussion with Glenda on the phone; when we go over there tomorrow evening for you to apologize, if she wishes to spank you too, you had better not object and embarrass me. As a DWC woman, and my friend, if she wants to punish you, she has my blessings." I wouldn't have written that and other similar story elements as just fiction, but it does seem like there were elements of the DWC that emphasized not only each individual wife's preeminent role, but that the women as a whole occupied an elevated spot in the hierarchy. Maybe Al, who was actually involved in the DWC for awhile, could comment.
Delete
ReplyDeleteYes, the “L” means led. The issue is the definition of led. There are leaders who make decisions and lead by command, and others who might steer and guide but ultimately make decisions jointly with others. I would put us in the second category - and I think T as well from his description. It’s arbitrary, but I guess I’m suggesting that an FLR is the former. We found the DWC just too late. They were reporting on their most recent get-together and talking about when the next one would happen, which never did. We would certainly have been interested in being part of that if it had happened. While the total obedience aspect might not have fit our relationship style, I think the idea that in such a gathering, wives might have authority to punish other husbands sounds reasonable. As you said, the DWC might have seen DD and FLR as two parts of the same thing. I would never expect to be spanked for disagreeing, but I might for the way l disagree - if I get snippy and “the four-year-old” comes out. TG
I might have discovered it a bit earlier than you, though I don't recall specifically a discussion of any specific upcoming get-together. They had a Yahoo group at the time I discovered them, but it was taken down pretty soon after that. I have a lot of regret around the fact that I didn't try to get engaged with them when it would have been possible. The reality is, I was just way too paranoid about confidentiality back then. Anne was probably the same, but I do wonder what might have happened had I been more open and then pushed her a little. Like I said, I really do regret that I let that opportunity for real-life connection, and possibly some really interesting experiences, slip by, all because I was paranoid about what others thought. I can defend it on the basis that it could have had negative career impact, and while that's true, looking back it was so unlikely to ever come out in that context. I put way too much weight on a very small possibility.
DeleteI wish I had the opportunity to
Deletetalk with the DWC group. I remember reading the website multiple times. I gave my wife the site to look at. She perused some of it and it still took sometime for us. Even if we had the opportunity to have met with the group, given the nature of our jobs, there is no way my wife would have wanted to spank another man or watch one be spanked. She is much too private of an individual. I would of had a hard time with the privacy factor as well. Although, I would have been more open to it now. You just can’t trust that confidentiality will remain in each persons best interest.
T
When I first read the DWC website, I did so over two or three days time. I just couldn't get it out of my mind, so I finally told my wife about it. I told her the url, and I wasn't sure she'd even look at it. She did, but if I'd had to bet, I would have bet that she wouldn't be into it. So, the biggest surprise to me of the whole thing was when she called me at work and told me she'd looked at it. All she said at first was, "Very interesting." I kind of swallowed hard and asked what that meant, and she said, "I guess it means you need to go buy me a heavy hairbrush." I was really very surprised both that she didn't react negatively to it and that she instantly got on board with wanting to actually try it.
DeleteI don't know how Anne would have felt about spanking another man. The real issue would be another woman spanking me, as she's always had a jealous streak.
When I get angry with myself for being so paranoid about anyone finding out and how that kept me from getting involved in the DWC, I do remember sometimes that wasn't really just about my then-current career. I'd also flirted with government roles from time to time, including roles that would have required a security clearance. I'm also a political junkie and for many years entertained a fantasy of running for an elected office. It was really those possibilities that scared me about confidentiality as much or more than my actual profession. Now, when I see total scumbags like a Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert get elected to congress, it's clear I worried too much.
In our FLR with DD household, we both agreed to and adhere to the concept of discipline as soon as possible after the offense, or when the offense becomes known. This includes being punished away from home, which is another topic, I know. This may be a carry over from my childhood when both parents carried out the punishment. There was no 'wait till your Father gets home' in our house. It has occurred that I got spanked again when Dad got home if the infraction warranted it, but again, that is another topic. Back to this weeks question, we strive for immediate punishment. Waiting or putting it off just seems wrong and I feel the discipline losses its effect if delivered too long after the incident.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the underserved spanking, it does happen, but it is quite rare. When drawing up our relationship agreement, it was a strong point in both of our minds that she was in control of discipline. We both were in favor of using bare ass spanking as the form of punishment. As close to the offense as possible, even away from home. She reinforced her control by insisting she had uncontested authority in determining if punishment was due, the position, implement(s), the severity, and the duration. I was not allowed to contest or even debate any of those points once she determined a punishment was needed. I was to accept the spanking and thank her afterwards. Of course I have been spanked at times when I felt it was unwarranted and even proved in the future that it was unjustified, but I do not expect or receive an apology or a mention of that fact or a free pass on the next offense. It merely becomes a spanking I received which was unjustified, now past and forgotten. This may seem harsh or unfair to some, but I truly love my FLR and would not choose any other form of lifestyle.
I wonder whether the "wait 'til your father gets home" thing was more common in some areas of the country than others? Where I was growing up, the moms were probably at least as involved in carrying out discipline as the fathers. I can think of maybe one friend, whose family had a big fundamentalist Christian bent in which the father clearly called the shots on pretty much everything, who almost always got punished by the dad. But, for most of us, the moms were probably at least as quick to pick up the belt as the fathers.
DeleteI go back and forth on how much discipline loses its effect if delayed. On the one hand, it's definitely the case that I start losing my feeling of needing accountability after about three our four days. On the other hand, there is something very affirming to the overall dynamic if I know that she will eventually deliver a spanking even if there has been a long delay, because that feels like she's kind of ignoring my feelings about accountability and delivering it regardless of whether I've lost the desire for it. But, to me, the real problem is that delayed punishment very often does become no punishment. But, it sounds like that is almost never an issue for you.
For me, the rare occasions when one might have seemed "undeserved" are massively offset by the number of times I haven't been punished and should have been. I know some don't think such offsetting negates the fairness issue, but there have been a few times where I've consciously bifurcated things in my mind, such that she believes she is spanking me for one thing, but in my mind I'm being punished for something else.
Wow! I may be in the minority here, but I think throwing away someone else's boxes without asking first if it's OK is impolite at best and inappropriate even in a vanilla relationship. In DD, it is definitely deserving of a spanking. Moreover, your refusal to acknowledge that should result in another spanking for attitude adjustment. Just my 2 cents, of course.
ReplyDeleteDelayed spankings are OK with me. Not preferred, but sometimes it happens.
Does it hurt more? Of course. If one hasn't been spanked for a few weeks, his butt is naturally going to be more sensitive.
Great topic and discussion, BTW! Graham
Not sure whether you're in the minority or not. Others might feel the same way, and that's fine. I would say that "someone else's" doesn't entirely fit the facts. She bought them, but it was for a common purpose, purchased with common funds, installed in our common property, and the boxes were stored in our common dresser. So, the description of them as "hers" doesn't quite fit the facts. But, I'm not relying on that as a defense because, in my attempts to turn back the tides of clutter, I'm sure I've thrown out other stuff that was more properly characterized as "hers".
DeleteI agree with you that it seems to be that an unspanked butt gets more sensitive. Others have attributed it to us simply forgetting how much a hard spanking hurts if it's been a while. I do agree that happens, but the proportion is very different.
I totally agree with Dan about being spanked for disobedience even if I think my action was justified. On several occasions she has made her expectations clear about something she does not want me to do or something she does. When I disagree , I tend to disobey and sometimes I'll hide it from her. When she discovers my disobedience I usually have to face the consequences. However, she does spend to much effort on the fairness of the matter and will let it slide if she thinks I might have a point. One time I initially believed i was right and hid my actions but when she found out she explained her side of it and I realized the error in my thinking. I had not been spanked in some time so after just a few swats I was really feeling it. I really struggle when discipline is not consistent but she can't bring herself to the level of strictness I expect.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I find kind of fascinating about inconsistency is that I suspect that a stricter, more consistent approach is probably something *both* parties would do better with. For the disciplinarian, I have no doubt that taking time for a session can be a problem when it comes on top of so many other responsibilities. Yet, I think one reason that wives feel pressure around the "fairness" thing that leads to inconsistency is they are always either second-guessing whether it's appropriate or, just as likely, over-rotating on what he's going to think of it, even though he was the one who actively pushed for this lifestyle and probably has pushed for more strictness. We men, on the other hand, do push for more consistency and more strictness but, we do things like, as you related, disobeying but not fessing up about it. So, it would probably be better for all concerned if the approach was stricter, less "forgiving" and more consistent, yet most of us, on both sides of the paddle, have these psychological and attitudinal bents that prevent us from doing something that is really in our own best interest.
DeleteHi all, posting for the first time. Sorry, I don't think my post is very relevant to this topic, but no time like the present to introduce myself.
ReplyDeleteI'm engaged to be married and my fiancée has suggested the idea of something that appears to resemble a DD relationship. She suggested it because I said I didn't want to allow things to build up, I'm a lot bigger than her and she likes the idea of being able to punish me in a controlled way.
I've heard it said that the buttocks are a padded area naturally meant for this, so it sounds logical. Can anyone offer me some advice for someone in my position considering this?
Hi Josh. Does your girlfriend have any experience in this kind of relationship? Any idea where she got the idea for it?
DeleteAs much as I like to think this blog is a great resource, I still think for concentrated information and lots of content that is more or less realistic about what the lifestyle entails, the Disciplinary Wives Club is hard to beat. The original website is down, but an archived version is available on the Wayback Machine. I have a link to it on the right side of this blog, under Links I Like. The Tips & Methods section has what I think is a fairly realistic description of what a real disciplinary spanking can be like, and there is a subsection on "reality testing."
I also have some of the old DWC publications, including a couple aimed at husbands and wives, respectively, who are thinking about this kind of lifestyle but haven't gotten into it yet. I can give you copies if you send me an email. My email address is listed in my Blogger profile.
Would Josh tell us his age range and that of his finance? Also the length of his relationship would be helpful. Both matter in terms of establishing a successful DD relationship
DeleteAlan
Hi Dan, many thanks for all your suggestions for materials. I have looked through many of them and they are definitely interesting reading. I may email you sometime soon. My fiancée found out about this type of relationship from women around her and her online reading. To my understanding, the women around her are generally good influences. Other areas of my society are prone to trash-talking men and generally being difficult as partners, but not this circle of hers, hence one reason why I'm willing to give this serious consideration. Also, their married lives appear to be happy.
DeleteAlan, my age range is my early 30s and my fiancée's is her very late teens, but has a maturity that greatly exceeds her years, for various reasons. To confirm, she is definitely within marriageable age for our jurisdiction. Our courtship started several months ago and our engagement began more recently than that. How does this affect your answers?
“Alan, my age range is my early 30s and my fiancée's is her very late teens, but she has a maturity that greatly exceeds her years…. Our courtship started several months ago, and our engagement began more recently than that. “
DeleteJosh,
you do need to have some depth conversations with your fiancée about her expectations, the direction she wants to go, etc. As a couple, you are not typical in contemplating female-led DD- but you are far from unique. You are uncommon in your ages since apparently most couples discover DD in their 40s or later, and most DD relationships seem to be introduced by males who seek female discipline (and usually are erotically excited by spanking. It is uncommon, but probably not rare, for women to initiate DD.
All this said, (assuming that you are genuine), you and your finance could be on the leading edge of a major trend among younger generations. It's no secret how dissatisfied most young women today are with their choice in male partners. At the same time, there is (apparently) an enormous imbalance in young males fantasizing about and seeking female-led DD (disciplinary spanking), compared to females interested in being disciplinarians. It seems entirely plausible that this army of young women, many sexually liberated and sophisticated, and seeking to improve male behavior, is discovering this imbalance and the leverage they gain by introducing discipline into their relationships. Erotic spanking itself is already hot in these generations, and evolving that into disciplinary spanking is a road at least some of us have traversed on our way to female-led DD
So, Josh, good luck, open and maintain those lines of communication with her, and take your ringside seat for what could be a major new trend in male-female relationships.
Alan
“Alan, my age range is my early 30s and my fiancée's is her very late teens, but she has a maturity that greatly exceeds her years…. Our courtship started several months ago, and our engagement began more recently than that. “
DeleteJosh,
you do need to have some depth conversations with your fiancée about her expectations, the direction she wants to go, etc. As a couple, you are not typical in contemplating female-led DD- but you are far from unique. You are uncommon in your ages since apparently most couples discover DD in their 40s or later, and most DD relationships seem to be introduced by males who seek female discipline (and usually are erotically excited by spanking. It is uncommon, but probably not rare, for women to initiate DD.
All this said, (assuming that you are genuine), you and your finance could be on the leading edge of a major trend among younger generations. It's no secret how dissatisfied most young women today are with their choice in male partners. At the same time, there is (apparently) an enormous imbalance in young males fantasizing about and seeking female-led DD (disciplinary spanking), compared to females interested in being disciplinarians. It seems entirely plausible that this army of young women, many sexually liberated and sophisticated, and seeking to improve male behavior, is discovering this imbalance and the leverage they gain by introducing discipline into their relationships. Erotic spanking itself is already hot in these generations, and evolving that into disciplinary spanking is a road at least some of us have traversed on our way to female-led DD
So, Josh, good luck, open and maintain those lines of communication with her, and take your ringside seat for what could be a major new trend in male-female relationships.
Alan
Alan, many thanks for the advice. I learned that there is some sort of auto-cleanup here, so trying to reply to you again.
DeleteI wouldn't call either of us what you said regarding adventurousness, though both of us think things just between a consenting married couple are largely okay
Regarding what you implied about starting out for one purpose and later moving to behaviour regulation, I put that to my fiancée and she said it definitely sounds like a good idea. She assumes (before having started, obviously) that it is a belt-and-braces way of doing things: some days she might be motivated for the first reason, other days for the second.
Another thing she likes about the idea is the potential for us to reach a stable state quickly, rather than fumbling over basic things: she wants me to make her a mother as soon as we've done the "bit of paper".
Regarding dissatisfaction with male partners, I would say she is relatively uninfluenced by the wider culture, with men being regularly trash-talked in the home and the music, leaving many women without the skills for a relationship. If she were that way, I would be much less likely to be engaged to her!
Wondering if we can chat offline to avoid the auto-cleanup?
Josh,
DeleteNot sure what you mean by "auto-cleanup"
Alan
Alan, I understand the system here automatically deletes many comments.
DeleteJosh,
Deletethe problem really is Google, which inanely blocks valid comments. mistaking them for spam. This sometimes leads to double-posting and especially to late comments. Dan does a great job of cleaning it up in near real time, but Google continues to remind us how hapless they have become. If one of your comments never shows up, let Dan know.
Alan
The real annoyance with Google's spam system is that it doesn't seem to be content-based. Like at all. The one and only thing that seems to trigger it from a content perspective is including a link. And, that one makes sense, given that commercial spam posted to old posts with an external link to whatever the scammer is selling IS a huge problem.
DeleteI will say that recently I have been leaving more "spam" comments deleted, and even deleting a few myself. Every once in a while, we get some commenters who--I'll just come out and say it--I come to believe aren't what they pretend to be. "Helen" in her various permutations. "Belle" in *her* various permutations. "Jack". Etc. Etc. Etc. I often put up with it for a longer time than I probably should, because it's not like I can prove to my 100% satisfaction that the person is a man pretending to be a woman or otherwise not genuine in their approach to posting here. But, when someone continues to post things that are tropes of DD fantasy stories and highly implausible, AND, when those tropes come from multiple commenters who just suddenly appear on the blog close in time, I start calling bullshit. It's been happening for several weeks now, and at first I just largely stopped responding to that poster. More recently, I've let the spam filter sweep up their stuff, and I've started deleting more of it myself. It's really become an annoyance, but it's hard to police it vigorously without deleting something that might be legit even if highly implausible. And, of course, they seldom stop voluntarily, because the whole reason these people keep coming back in various disguises spinning the same tropes is because they almost certainly have OCD issues. Something I've been considering for the first time ever is to take a page from Aunt Kay's handbook and require those who I suspect of abusing the group this way to give me a phone call so I can verify they are at least the same gender they are claiming.
Anyway, yes, the spam filter is overly busy these days, but I'm also less prone to spend my day releasing said spam from those posters who I kind of suspect are full of shit anyway.
There is no way a guy has a teenaged fiancee who wants to spank him and he ends up here.
DeleteMW, only a few red flags there, no? Not just a teenage fiancee who initiates a DD relationship but apparently she has a whole network of similarly motivated female friends living the dream. I seem to recall similar claims of whole network of spanking couples in an implausible demographic from another recent poster. Then there is the spanked in preparation for marriage theme. And the sex for purposes of procreation theme. And, the allusion to being in an entirely different culture/society where all this implausible stuff is the norm.
DeleteI have mixed thoughts on "Josh" and his "fiancee."
DeleteHe never really says exactly what his fiancee is suggesting, so it could be more along the lines of an FLR rather than explicit DD. His descriptions of her "female friends" and their relationships could be consistent with that type of FLR dynamic, that he himself may be extending (in his own mind) into something more than his fiancee ever intended. However, if he has now raised the issue of DD with her, all the better.
To my perspective, he seems more like a person honestly looking for information, for whatever reason, than someone posting a fantasy as really life.
Something else I noticed: Many (most?) of the prior "fantasists" who posted here either (1) posted under the "anonymous" moniker, or (2) had Google accounts of very recent vintage (weeks to few months). Josh has had a blogger account since 2008, almost seventeen years. That doesn't seem to really fit with him being a fantasists or troll.
So, a 17 year-old Blogger account, used by someone who says he's now in his very early 30s, and is marrying someone in their teens, makes it MORE credible to you??
DeleteYou're right; I hadn't thought about that combination.
DeleteIn my opinion there's always a give and take. How much have you thought about it and discussed what she has in mind? For us I was the one that strict brought it up as a way to solve conflict and end arguments. I dont think I completely thought it thru. Maybe because I was turned on by the idea of being spanked. It didn't immediately solve every problem because she was reluctant but one day she was complaining about my attitude and behavior. I was mad and blurted out "if you dont like it do something about it" I stomped outside to take care of something and when I came back in she told me I was going to regret raising my voice to her. It was the longest and hardest spanking she had given me to that point. Since then severity has not been a problem every spanking hurts. I will tell you this i respect her for doing it. I wish she would be more consistently but when she steps up to the plate she is a home run hitter
ReplyDeleteWard, many thanks for your thoughts. I will definitely give them strong consideration in advance of further discussions with my fiancée.
DeleteIt is fairly recently that my fiancée suggested this, so we haven't had many detailed discussions so far. I therefore don't know much about what she has in mind. However, I have been thinking about it a lot and I've been researching it online a lot as well. What sort of questions would you be asking in my position?
See my comment above about the Disciplinary Wives Club website as a resource. But, it sounds like step #1 for you should probably be having that conversation with your fiancee about what she has in mind.
DeleteDan, definitely happy to do this. What sort of specific questions, based on your accumulated experience, in my position, would you ask?
DeleteFirst, if a long time has gone by since the last spanking, it does hurt more. We are both committed to an ongoing DD relationship, and it isn't an FLR. It's a little hard to nail down the exact limits of her authority in the relationship, but there are 2 basic concepts r.e. DD we agree upon. One is that she has the authority to spank anytime for any reason, period. The other is she can give me a warning by asking me "are you arguing with me?", which lets me know I am getting close to earning a spanking, and it will stop me in my tracks. Put that way, it does sound like she has a lot of authority, but we usually agree, and she isn't into controlling me. Our DD has changed a lot over the last 5 years, in that at the beginning, there were many things that annoyed her about my behavior. Most of the things that bothered her were connected with my alcohol consumption, as I have said before. After a few years of very consistent disciplinary spanking, she prevailed. Then, she went on to successfully alter the other behaviors, such as putting down the toilet seat, turning off the cell during dinner or on walks, and stop leaving the stove burners on. Again, she prevailed. Now our DD is basically focused on maintenance, and I seldom get disciplinary spankings anymore. Every so often, I will still get one, usually for over reacting to something, and I am grateful to her for doing so. An example of that was when I was spanked last month for getting into a snit about a relatively petty issue. She told me I would be spanked as soon as we got home, which changed my atttitude immediately. Those kinds of spankings are not at all sexual, and she is very matter of fact when ordering and giving them. They are the most maternal, as I feel I have no choice but to submit. As far as consistency goes, it could be better, but I am basically very content, as I know she will eventually catch up eventually.
ReplyDeleteI often think that, when you're starting out in serious DD, that it may be better to start with small annoyances first, then work you're way up. Sounds like you're a counter-example though, starting with something hard like drinking, then moving on to smaller issues.
Delete“…she has the authority to spank anytime for any reason, period”
DeleteTo me, this covers obedience to the extent she wants obedience (and I think most women do want obedience, even in vanilla relationships). My wife’s standard is “direct disobedience.”. So, if she issues an order and I explicitly disobey it, I have been “defiant.” A classic example would be “I want this to be your last beer”, and then I open another one. Dan’s situation (throwing out boxes without her permission) would not have been direct disobedience for us, as there is a sort of limited time frame inherent in it. For my wife, the disobedience must be in your face style, maybe accompanied by a quick tantrum or disrespect. But I still might have been spanked for what Dan did if getting her permission to do it was, a priori, “spankable” behavior.
However, the larger point is that once “anytime for any reason” is adopted and internalized, “disobedience”, as defined by her, is part of discipline in your relationship. Agreeing to “anytime for any reason is exciting for a spanko. But for me, learning to obey her when I didn’t want to and accepting the consequences for disobedience ( as defined by her) has been one of the toughest parts of DD. At the same time, it has probably been indispensable in building and maintaining her confidence. In my first DD/spanking relationship, I did not understand this well and was frequently disobedient to the point of actually refusing to submit to a spanking. This did major damage to that relationship, particularly my GF’s ability to deliver consistent discipline.
Alan
Alan, Dan's example of throwing out the boxes would definitely earn me a spanking.
DeleteAnd it should, because it would be something she knows I realize she would not like me to do. You are correct that agreeing to "anytime for any reason is exciting to a spanko", which I certainly identify myself as. Also agreed that accepting her decision about something I didn't agree with can be difficult, but doing so is what makes a DD relationship real. Often, after a spanking, I am more inclined to see her point of view. The ability and willingness to deliver consistent discipline is key, and it takes a strong, mature, woman to do that, especially with a headstrong man.
" Often, after a spanking, I am more inclined to see her point of view."
DeleteOthers have noted this and I have experienced it also. For me, this illustrates how motivational spanking can be: we are often incapable of realizing what our wives realize only too well and that is that we need a spanking. But when its over, our brain, now more relaxed allows more objective clarity . If you are like me,looking back,thee are few times she has spanked me that I my behavior fully justified it.
Alan
"So, if she issues an order and I explicitly disobey it, I have been “defiant.” A classic example would be “I want this to be your last beer”, and then I open another one."
DeleteThat has been a pretty common one for me at a few parties. Her order is usually a little more subtle, but an order nonetheless. My only real excuse in the past was that it tended to happen at parties thrown by a friend of hers, whose whole family are all big boozers. I saw it as unreasonable to drag me to one of their parties and then expect me to drink at a pace far behind theirs.
I do agree that a habit of obedience probably is critical at her gaining confidence. I've been finding lately that she's getting more openly critical of "small things" even if they don't lead to a spanking. Last night, she texted me a picture of some ground coffee I apparently spilled on our wood floors yesterday while cleaning off the counter, with an angry emoji. I don't think that would have happened a year ago for something that small and that was part of actually doing a kitchen chore but just done poorly.
Norton, I often find that accepting her decision on something that runs counter to what I want is WAY harder than taking a spanking.
I would never directly disobey my wife. She’s not the type to say don’t have another drink at a party. We are social drinkers and tend to have a few more at parties, than we normally would. I can see if your struggle with drinking, than DD could help reduce your intake. My wife has stated to me, we are not going to be the last ones to leave tonight or else. We stayed later and I said would you like to head home? She replied, yes and then a buddy poured me one more. I was strapped because she wanted to leave and our friends didn’t want us too. Unlike Alan’s explanation above, I can actually say I’ve never refused to bend over for a thrashing. Even when I disagreed with my wife, I always felt that I’ve earned one in some form. I haven’t been happy about it, but my wife has agreed to this arrangement and I’m sure It’s not easy for our wives at times. A lot of maturity has come from our arrangement and I’ve corrected my mouth and attitude tremendously since starting DD.
DeleteT
I've never flat-out refused, but there have been a couple when I was so argumentative that it didn't happen. Those incidents led to big fights and ultimately just weren't worth it.
DeleteEvery couple needs to figure out what works for them. We were both aware of the need for me to cut back, as the excessive drinking contributed to all the other bad behavior. Therefore, it was necessary to tackle the big issue first. I had tried to cut back many times before, but was never successful. We were both really committed to making it happen, and my life is much different now because of it. Unfortunately, you won't read about this in Psychology Today, or Dear Abby.
ReplyDelete" We were both really committed to making it happen..."
ReplyDeleteYou mix consistent disciplinary spanking with this mutual commitment and add a reasonable amount of time and deep behavioral changes are possible. My former G.F. did it with smoking and my wife has also made it happen
Alan
Smoking is an interesting one for me. I smoked for several years, and struggled multiple times to quit. For me, it wasn't really a psychological habit; I was extremely addicted to nicotine. Yet, after trying to quit and failing many times, I quit a few months after starting to date Anne, because I knew she didn't like the smell and it was inconvenient brushing my teeth so many times every day. That was years before we discovered DD, but maybe I already had some tendencies to defer to her wishes even back then even if I wasn't aware of them at the time.
DeleteI do think that had we been together and into DD at the time of my prior aborted attempts to quit, it almost certainly would have helped. There were several times that I quit for days and even weeks, but always picked them up again. Had there been an actual consequence for that, I might have stuck to the program.
I never had the desire to smoke. I think it’s because of watching my Grandparents smoke to excess that turned me off. I dated a girl for a while who smoked and despised kissing her. It literally was like kissing an ash tray. Even when she brushed and used mouthwash, the smoke is still there.
DeleteT
It's funny, but for years, even before I began smoking, I really couldn't smell it on someone else. Maybe that's because both my parents smoked when I was growing up. But, after I quit, I found that people who smoked just reeked of it! I'm very glad I quit, though I lost a relative to lung cancer earlier this year, and he quit over 25 years ago.
DeleteBack (initially) to the first part of the topic. Throwing out the boxes would not in itself earned me a spanking; arguing my defence probably would. It feels like defiant behaviour and this judge would order punishment!
ReplyDeleteWe had an incident obliquely related to the main topic which I am still working out and would like to share. I had a spanking ‘building up’ for a variety of small infractions and because she like to ‘reset’ me at least every few weeks. Peace has largely reigned in our house for about the last 8 weeks (we have a tendency to have quite lively arguments every few weeks) and so the lead up to the spanking was quite ‘civilised’ but inevitable. During our early morning chat she simply raised the topic (amongst others) and announced today was the day and to get in position. It was a hard strapping but accepted as necessary & deserved by both parties. However within the hour she was being argumentative about some trivia which I became slightly irritated at, mainly because it was trivia but also because she knows that I am always calm & submissive after punishment. I went out on some errands leaving a small degree of tension in the air and on my return she fixated on another couple of minor issues which then led to an argument.
I have made the point to her since that I struggle with the mix of being subject to a DD regime and what I have described as inappropriate verbal oppression. I feel that it’s either one or the other.
As I write, we are still working this through. Emotions have calmed and I suspect we may have a reconciliation discussion shortly. I may feel the strap again as a result.
I do feel that if a wife accepts DD responsibility & privileges then there is a responsibility on her also to be more disciplined …? TB
"I do feel that if a wife accepts DD responsibility & privileges then there is a responsibility on her also to be more disciplined …? "
DeleteI agree, or at least one would hope that would be a result. The best leaders do so by example, of course.
But, your specific example is hard for me, because I've told my wife that I WANT her to be more verbally assertive and strict, which does seem to translate into riding more on small things. So, what you see as "verbal oppression" might be close to the verbal strictness and control I've been saying I want. But, that doesn't mean that, in the moment, I wouldn't react exactly the same way you did. It came up in a small way yesterday, which I mentioned in a comment. She texted me a pick of some ground coffee on our hardwood kitchen floor, which I apparently accidentally dropped there when wiping off the counter around the coffee maker. It was an accident and something I didn't even notice, but she did and called it out. Which is, I guess, in line with the increased strictness I've been asking for. While I don't take the incident itself seriously, it did seem like a sign of her getting increasingly confident about riding me on even small irritations.
Though, that does bring into play the whole box thing with which I started this post. Yes, one would hope that holding me accountable for some spilled coffee would result in some additional reflection on the mounds of unnecessary clutter someone else in my house leaves in her wake just because she can always talk herself into why we just have to have that computer packaging from a four year-old computer just in case.
I had a similar incident about spilling something on the kitchen floor and she 'summoned' me from literally the other side of the house where I was busy doing something to point it out to me when she could have easily just cleaned it up herself , then she watched while I knelt down and cleaned it up.
DeleteThen I got in trouble for arguing with her and pointing out what a waste of time it was.
I don't know if it was deliberate but she was able to escalate a non-spanking offence into a spanking offence.
I hadn't even thought about a wife deliberately deciding to try to escalate a non-spanking offense into a spanking one, but I guess once they go down the road of consciously trying to be more strict . . .
DeleteGlenmore,
DeleteI didn't tend to do that with J., because as far as I'm concerned, if there had been no real predicability regarding what might lead to one, the behaviour-enhancing benefits would have been lost.
I suppose he would have submitted to one that was specifically designated as not being for any specific reason, had I asked for it, but I suppose we already did so or other reasons anyway and usually daily. As a result, I had no reason to engineer situations like the one described, as I wouldn't have had long to wait.
L.
L
DeleteOnce in a while I feel a spanking has been engineered, but it's usually the culmination of a series of small things she finds irritating. Still, I'm taken by surprise.
I like to think she didn't knowingly escalate it but I was mad at being summoned from something important I was doing to handle something she could have done herself and I lost my temper and crossed the line by being rude to her.
DeleteLesson learned, reply with a Yes Ma'am next time.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteTB,
ReplyDeleteIf this happened to me, I would think one or both of two things was going on. The first is that she finishes you punishment before she is really satisfied that you have been sufficiently punished. Her subsequent "verbal aggression" expresses her feelings of frustration. One fix for that is to encourage her to use corner time during spanking with the clear option to continue the spanking after you both have had some time to process it. This increases the chance that when she releases you, she will feel your punishment is over.
The other possibility is that she is testing your obedience and submission, especially after she has spanked you. Women do look for and expect results,and it is possible she is not seeing the kind of change she expects or wants. IT does sound like there is a mismatch of expectations going on and maybe a good long discussion would resolve it
Alan
I am in a position where my wife is so inconsistent about DD and FLR that I’m no longer sure whether we have a FLR anymore. Occasionally my wife will threaten to spank me, but there is no longer any follow through. There is an upside, I suppose. I no longer have to do most of the housework like I did when the FLR dynamic was at its height. And she no longer demands and enforces strict obedience. There was I time when she would tell me to do something, and I knew that meant “do it NOW, or else.” And if I argued with her about it, she would put an end to the argument with a spanking. Out of force of habit, I still try to be somewhat obedient, but I am becoming as inconsistent about obeying as she is about enforcing obedience. We are back to having arguments about stuff like we did in pre-FLR days. I have a craving for her to put me in my place like she used to, even though it wasn’t always fair. I didn’t want her to be fair. I told my therapist that I feel bad about arguing with my wife but that if she nags at me about something and doesn’t MAKE me obey, I can’t stop myself from arguing. My therapist says that the relationship as it stands now is pretty normal. She says that all couples argue because there will always be some conflicting perceptions about what is fair. She asked me whether I really wanted to go back to having to do most of the housework and having to do what I’m told rather than being my wife’s equal. My answer was, “I don’t know. Maybe.” At which point my therapist used the famous saying, “Be careful what you wish for.”
ReplyDeleteAt the height of our FLR, my wife claimed that for her there was nothing sexual about spanking me or demanding obedience. She said it was purely pragmatic for her. But I wonder whether that was true because it seems to me that her willingness to be the boss has diminished as her libido has diminished with age. Maybe spanking me and making me obey was more sexual for her than she realized herself and that’s the reason she is less dominant now.
Doug
That sounds rough. I'm sorry you're in such a tough spot. Have you had a heart-to-heart with your wife and just told her straight up that you'd like to return to a dynamic where she is more dominating and strict?
DeleteWe have recently gone through a change in how she spanks, as requested by me. She used to start and stop, lecturing me when she stopped. It never occurred to me, but that kind of spanking allowed me to be able to handle it better, and not loose control. Then recently, she spanked me without stopping for about 3 or 4 minutes. Within the first minute, I was quite overwhelmed, and had obviously lost control, kicking and making noise. It seemed to me that a much more effective way to spank, as I don't really want to feel in control. It does make a spanking much harder to take, but it also makes even a maintenance spanking an event I will not feel too blasé about, as I have in the past. Possible future topic?
ReplyDeleteThis might make a future topic. We have talked about various spanking styles or techniques, but never or not recently about their relative effectiveness. I suspect one style of spanking becomes habitual in mature relationships. But it could be eye opening to discuss which style, if any, works best in any given situation -and what style is most common or rarest. There are a lot of moving parts implied, such as the spanking tool(s) used, purpose of the spanking, the wife's preferred style, the history and experience of a couple, etc.
DeleteAlan
I bet that nonstop spanking is the way to go for a lot of wives. They are often taking cues from their husbands about how to spank their husbands effectively. Nonstop is easy to understand how to do and it hurts. They just need to learn to keep going when it seems like the spanking is too much. For all our inconsistencies and faults, this is something my wife does well, always willing to use the heavy paddle or brush and to just go for a number or amount of time. It feels like she starts too soon after I bend over, which makes me nervous to look away from her.
DeleteJust popping in after 9 months away from the club, which coincided with a break in our maintenance cycle, I stopped that whilst I took a course of therapy with a "kink affirming Psycho-Sexual" therapist. I enjoyed the sessions but it was a expensive and time consuming way to confirm I'm not the barrier to what I hope for from Mrs GL. Also coincidently I lost access to blogger as well. I have a verbal indication we can go back to our fortnightly cycle and that is also why I agree with the last contribution that making maintenance less exciting and more dreaded is a decent topic and a hope for the future for me. Hope all well here Dan? Cheers GLM
ReplyDeleteGLM, Nice to see you again, Although I don't post much here, I have been reading this blog for years. Can you please expand on what a "kink affirming Psyco-Sexual" Therapist is and do they differ from a "kink aware" Therapist
Deleteabove comment from George
DeleteGLM, for me, the idea of a maintenance spanking being a more difficult ordeal for me to go through does not make it "less exciting". In fact, for me it makes it more exciting, as it takes me out of my comfort zone if I am being spanked in a manner that makes me loose control.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, it does make it more daunting, and obviously, more real. It also increases her power and my submissiveness, which seems like a desirable goal for both of us. Of course I don't want it while it is happening, but the overall result is positive.
Hi Dan,
ReplyDeleteI have had a busy week with no time to interact here, but let me at least take a quick stab at your questions:
"Have you experienced the phenomenon in which spankings hurt way worse if there is a long time between them?" - Absolutely. There simply is no comparison of how much more spankings hurt if your bottom is not being spanked regularly.
"If so, is that additional pain enough to make you prefer being spanked more regularly?" - No, I don't like actual spankings that much, so I would not choose them to be more often. However, if at some time my wife decided to start doing maintenance or something like that, then even though I wouldn't want the regular spankings, I would be thankful that my bottom would become (and stay) less sensitive.
"How does this work in your DD relationship? Is disobedience spankable in and of itself?" - It should be, but quite frankly, for the most part it really isn't.
"Do the wives worry about 'fairness'? Do they maybe worry about it too much?" - So far, I would say that my wife worrying about fairness has been one of the largest impediments to her ramping up strictness, right up there with being unable to understand just how I could possibly want this.
"How much does your agreement about the underlying premise for the spanking affect whether it happens?" - Probably too much. For the sake of the DD relationship, it would be much better if she simply steamrolled my objections, or at the very least was willing to talk about them after the punishment, in the unlikely event that I still felt I was unjustly punished - as we have talked about here many times, almost always my objections about how I am being unfairly punished seem to simply disappear by the time a punishment is done.
-ZM
I receive a very short time to object or explain before she shuts it down. But I have unlimited time to litigate her decision after its over. Knowing I can protest and justify myself later helps me submit to her quickly. Also I have learned ( since about our second year of DD) that arguing about a spanking she is determined to administer is a losing strategy. We do have a safe word and I have used it but never to get out of a spanking.
DeleteAlan
Thanks, ZM! It's hard for me to rank just how big and impact "fairness" has on consistency for us, but it's significant for sure. But, it's kind of indirect. Over 20 years, we haven't had many discussions about whether a particular punishment was fair, and there have been only a handful of times when she has suggested that she wasn't spanking for something because she thought to do so would be unfair. But, where I think it is an issue is she will sometimes ask me whether I think something should be spankable or whether I should be spanked for some behavior that is kind of on the line. I think it would be better, for both of us, if she would do it and stop worrying about whether I agree with her. I think just seeking my input about it is a problem, when we've agreed it's her decision to make.
DeleteI have had a scheduled weekly sessions for at least 5 months (preemptive to avoid drinking). She has the authority to order an unscheduled session on the following day if she decides to call me out for being argumentative, dismissive or insensitive. This hasn't happened yet but has been lightheartedly teased about when I am on the boundary. Since I have had consistent weekly resets, I can't comment to the effect of infrequent spankings. E.
ReplyDeleteSorry folks - way late too this party but life has been busy as of late.
ReplyDeleteI noted the comment in the discussion as to what extent the idea of FLR may have been present in the DWC back when it was an actual operating organization - mostly a private Yahoo group - although there was at least one group gathering, and various couples did meet with Kay and Jerry (Tomy) if they were visiting the Bay Area on occasion.
My wife and I were members of the DWC and had numerous phone calls and email exchanges with Kay and Jerry during that time - although we never met in person. I assisted Kay with the moderation of the second Yahoo group (the Gathering Place) after Yahoo had shut down the first one (The Sanctuary). So, I was very aware of all the discussions there. This was around 2001/2002.
I don't recall every seeing the term "FLR" in the discussions there (but perhaps the term wasn't prevalent at that point). However, that aside, I believe it would be safe to say that, in general, the couples there - including Kay and Jerry - saw themselves as typical modern partnership marriages in which the wife had disciplinary authority over her husband in terms of ensuring appropriate behavior and a good attitude. I do specifically recall one thread on that issue - and that was the general consensus (and in one case, the couple still considered the husband to be the head of the household - except when it came to domestic discipline).
The focus of discussion was always on "maternal style" F/M DD - in essence "to keep the husband well behaved". There was not really any significant discussion on the wife's leading the marriage in general or with absolute authority. And - Kay absolutely forbade any discussion of Femdom or sexually related topics on the group (if it had been a live get together, she undoubtedly would have soundly paddled any of the men who started in with that...).
That said, as we all know - in any established DWC-style relationship, the wife will always have a special kind of authority in the marriage - and I am absolutely certain that was true with Kay and Jerry.
--al
" The focus of discussion was always on "maternal style" F/M DD - in essence "to keep the husband well behaved". There was not really any significant discussion on the wife's leading the marriage in general or with absolute authority."
DeleteThis describes the fault line between F/M DD and an FLR. Female-led relationships occupy a wide spectrum, separated by that fault line. The difference between "female-led" DD and an FLR ultimately depends on the female in the relationship. If she decided to take it in that direction toward an FLR, it is liable to go that direction. But the difference between DD and an FLR is huge. In both my relationships, my partner had the authority to discipline my behavior (especially within the relationship). But it is in the context of a dynamic partnership.
Alan
The problem in delineating between DD and FLR is that, while probably every person in this lifestyle would define DD in line with how pretty much everyone else uses it, there is no such consensus around FLR and people not only have very divergent views on what it entails but don't even use the individual components of the phrase similarly. In this thread, TG and I had an exchange that shows that we don't use a word as simple as "Led" in the same way, with him using it to convey a level or extent of unfettered decision-making authority that is very, very different than how I use that word. Alan, you see the difference between DD and FLR as huge. I actually don't, but I think that's because we just have completely different relationship styles in mind when we use that term and, unfortunately, the term is not self-defining and those of us in these relationships are all over the map in how we use the term.
DeleteThat's illustrated in part in my own conversations with "Jerry" of the DWC. I don't think he's ever used the term FLR, and might deny being in one. Yet, it's also very clear to me that the level of control exercised by Kay, and the level she advised other wives to take, is more extensive than anything that is reflected consistently in my own marriage. Yet, I do think I am in what I would describe as an FLR, albeit a light-intensity version of one.
Al, it's interesting that the "maternal style" was emphasized so much. Somehow, in the first several years of our DD relationship, that mostly went right over my head, to the extent that when someone pointed out to me that "maternal" was right there in the description of a DD lifestyle prominently featured on the intro page of the DWC website, I had never keyed in on it.
DeleteBut, the emphasis on that again shows to me the extent to which it is very hard to draw a line between DD and FLR. To me, one of the inherent features of a maternal-child relationship is that the mom is in control and the child is not. She sets the rules and the kid has to comply with them or suffer the consequences. It is a very hierarchical relationship in which one party has very substantial control and other has very little. That being the case, how exactly is a "maternal"-style" relationship distinguishable from a "female led" one?
I tend to agree there is a big difference between FLR and DD. I understand that there are different levels of FLR’, but to me the explanation is, she leads. This could be small or go to great lengths. My wife doesn’t lead. She punishes for agreed upon infractions. I handle most of the major tasks and my wife handles other tasks. We split the housework and make major decisions together. I’ve always attributed FLR to the female leading and making most of the decisions on the lower end, to all the decisions on the higher level. Whereas DD is punishment for agreed upon actions. This is my two cents anyway.
DeleteT