“It's very difficult to make a 100% turnaround. It's tough when you actually do exhibit patterns of bad behavior. You need to have a very strong support system of people who are willing to keep you in your place if you're going to overcome these things.” - Daniel Cormier
Hello all. Welcome back to The Disciplinary Couple’s Club. Our weekly on-line gathering of men and women who are in, or would like to be in, a Domestic Discipline relationship.
Once again, before we get started, I would like to thank the Disciplinary Wives who have recently joined us and to extend an invitation to all others who may be inclined to move from “lurker” to “commenter” status. We like having you around.
I hope you all had a great week. Mine was uneventful, yet I felt atypically good. Like maybe I’m finally turning the corner on the string of bad luck and bad health trends that started around Thanksgiving of last year. It’s been a tough few months, but maybe I’m moving past it.
It isn’t an entirely accidental change of trajectory. For the last couple of weeks, I’ve been doing a better job of taking care of myself in terms of diet, exercise, meditation, etc. It’s amazing how treating yourself just slightly better can make a big difference in your mood and feelings of wellbeing. Yet, most of the time it takes a conscious choice to get out of our self-created ruts, and maybe some external motivation. More on that below.
Thanks to those of you who gave advice and recounted personal experience with caning. As I said, I don’t really like doing posts about particular instruments, I decided to be a little self-indulgent, given that we are experimenting with the cane now but have very little experience with it.
One interesting takeaway from
the discussion is that the cane may be the only instrument in all of DD world
that seems to require a particular degree of force and accuracy that can only
be generated through a combination of practice and confidence. Anyway, I know it may have been a topic with limited
audience appeal, so thanks for bearing with me.
A couple of weeks ago, on the topic of fantasies, TB offered this:
I often fantasise that she is ‘always on’ DD wise so that there is zero doubt for either of us on the ‘if …. Then’ construct. In other words, zero tolerance for any boundary crossing. And that every session was ‘merciless’ - hard, relentless and painful. (I’ve given up trying to work out why I want this). I am convinced that my behaviour would quickly improve and that we would both be happier/even more content.
I have tried to articulate this to her, and she says she gets it and is supportive, but we quickly revert to our ‘normal’ DD where I ‘get away’ with behaviours and then there is a reckoning when she’s finally had enough.
Seems like a simple change to me but as yet I have failed to get this fantasy realised…. TB
I share TB’s fantasy of a much more strictly enforced set of boundaries. Though, it's more than a fantasy. It's a genuine hope that Anne takes things in that direction at some point.
I’ve often said I want more consistency, but I think what TB is suggesting goes beyond mere consistency. Instead, it’s about having a fairly rigorous set of rules or imposed standards, and then a very strict approach to enforcing them. In other words, it’s about tight boundaries and “zero tolerance” when it comes to enforcement.
The last time I did a topic on “zero tolerance” was about four years ago. Although the discussion was generally good, there seemed to be a lot of talking past each other. The source of the problem seemed to be that some thought I was defining “zero tolerance” as getting spanked or otherwise punished for every little thing.
That’s not what I’m talking about. Rather, I’m talking about getting spanked for everything that she sees as a significant problem or irritant and much more strictness and rigor in making sure those things actually do get punished.
It’s about not tolerating excuses or efforts to delay or avoid a spanking that has been earned.
And, while it is about consistency to some extent, it’s also about setting a generally higher bar for what both she and I expect of me.
So, in that sense while it is not about getting spanked for every little thing, it probably is about getting spanked for a greater number of things than I do now. But, in part that is because, if I’m honest, there are a lot of things I do that irritate or anger her, or that either she sees as a problem or we both do, yet I get away with doing those things over and over again. Sometimes it's because I offer excuses or a delay becomes it not happening at all. But, sometimes she has said she is going to be strict about something but doesn't follow through.
In the twenty years we’ve been doing DD, we’ve never really had a “zero tolerance” approach, whether with respect to a particular issue or the relationship as a whole.
The thing that I seem to do most often that angers her the most is leaving the house and failing to lock the doors when I leave, or sometimes accidentally leaving the garage door open either when I leave or when I go into the house. Because it is something that pisses her off, and does so fairly regularly, I often think she will finally get fed up and impose a “zero tolerance” approach for that one issue, it never really happens. She tolerates way too many excuses, or too often lets me by without any excuse, probably because there was a fairly long time between incidents.
Interestingly, while I often bemoan my lack of willpower, I have successfully imposed a few “zero tolerance” rules on myself. Tobacco use is probably the best example. In high school and college, I was a regular tobacco user, and nicotine has been my one and only true physical addiction. I tried to quit several times, and a few times I succeeded for a few weeks. But, I always started again. When I finally quit for good, I went cold turkey, And, in thirty years I’ve never had another cigarette. I just can’t let myself do it, because I know that if I were to have one cigarette on a special occasion, a week later I would be having “just one” a day, then one would become three, then three would become a pack-a-day habit.
I conquered my nicotine addiction before we were into DD, but I suspect that one or more of my aborted attempts at ending that addiction might have been successful had I had a strict Disciplinary Wife giving me some additional motivation. However, the habit and the physical addiction were so strong, it probably would have taken a “zero tolerance” approach.
Although I suspect ending deeply rooted habits and addictions might require something like a “zero tolerance” approach, I’m similar to TB in wanting “smaller” things also to be subject to very strict discipline because small things can be big stressors in a relationship or can have a big cumulative impact on your quality of life.
A good example for me is carelessness. Everyone is careless from time to time, but part of my identity has always revolved around risk taking and/or being cavalier about consequences. And, I’m not very detail oriented. I know I would be happier if I avoided the multiple times a year that I do something stupid from sheer lack of attention. And, our bank account would be better for it.
One challenge with a “zero tolerance” approach to things like carelessness, however, is it often happens when Anne isn’t there. Thus, having her address them would be dependent on me self-reporting, and my track record on that is mixed at best.
Most of my discussion about this so far has been about whether a “zero tolerance” approach would be efficacious for changing behavior for the better. That was also the focus when I last did this topic back in 2021.
With four years of increasing self-awareness, however, I realize that my attraction to zero tolerance is about more than changing my behavior and the benefits I think that would bring. Rather, I fantasize about it/hope for it, because part of me wants the intense feelings that I think would go along with it. In short, part of me is morbidly attracted to being under my wife’s stern hand to a much greater extent than I am now.
I’m not under any illusion that a “zero tolerance” approach would be anything but incredibly challenging, both emotionally and in terms of perhaps having a perpetually sort ass for whatever time it too for my behavior to improve to her satisfaction. I suspect that I would be resentful or angry much of the time it was happening, though that anger might be directed at myself. I can't find it now, but in the last year or so a commenter here talked about a period in which his wife became super strict in holding him accountable on a couple of behavioral issues, to the point that he was getting spanked almost daily. I recall him describing how hard it was, and that a big part of the emotional challenge was feeling like a screw-up who couldn’t get his act together to avoid being spanked so often.
I’m sure I would feel that way for a while if my wife ever did become super strict and “zero tolerance” in her approach. Yet, part of me clearly is attracted to the prospect of being humbled in that way and to being subject to that level of rigorous control. And, while I suspect it would be super challenging as it was happening, it also likely would be incredibly attractive and stimulating after the fact.
Have you ever been subject to a “zero tolerance” approach in your DD relationship? If so, was it about a particular issue, or was it a broader approaching dealing with a wider range of behavior. How did it make you feel? How did it make her feel? If you haven’t experienced that sort of super strict approach, do you want to?
For the wives, is a “zero tolerance” approach appealing? Or, does it seem burdensome? Is it easier to take an approach of punishing every time something happens, or do you place more value on having the discretion to determine whether to let something slide? If you are attracted to “zero tolerance” but haven’t implemented it, why not?
Have a great week.