Monday, September 1, 2025

Spanking Style/Technique and Effectiveness (Club Meeting - 527)

“If I had to live my life again, I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner.” -Tallulah Bankhead

Hello all. Welcome back to The Disciplinary Couple’s Club.  Our weekly on-line gathering of men and women who are in, or would like to be in, a Domestic Discipline relationship.

 

Happy Labor Day to those in the U.S.  I hope you’re getting some time off to enjoy it.

 

I hope you all had a good week.  Mine was pretty punishing, in a non-DD sense.  I attended a big gathering of old friends. It was fun, though I got this sense that we hadn’t changed as much this time as the last time we got together, which was almost a decade ago.  It was a little depressing recognizing that we’ve all gotten old enough that the major life changes are starting to be mostly in the rearview mirror.  I did get the sense that I’m digging in my heels a bit more than others when it comes to settling into middle-age.

 

 

But, a good time was had by all.  Perhaps a little too good, if my bedtime after the events was any indication. I definitely don’t rally the next morning after a long night as easily as I did back then.

 

Thanks to those who joined in on the discussion last week.  I didn’t have many takeaways from it, other than I’d note that few, if any, people expressed any big concerns about “undeserved” punishments or being subjected to discipline we don’t really agree with.  I think we all recognized that there might be times when she thinks something should be punished and we don’t fully agree, but no one seemed to see it as a significant problem.  That should be reassuring to any of the wives who are sometimes held back by concerns about fairness.

 

I’m not sure we got anywhere with the discussion of whether disobedience is something separate and distinct from being punished for specific misbehavior.  It seemed to get side-tracked onto the question of what is and is not an FLR, which we’ve kind of beaten to death over the years and are unlikely to ever resolve.  As I said in a response to Alan, I think the vast majority here are more or less on the same page with what a DD relationship is, but there is clearly no consensus around what distinguishes it from an FLR, and it seems clear to me that the connotations we draw from (or impose on) the term differ dramatically from one individual to another, perhaps especially with respect to whether and to what extent “led” has some dictatorial connotation. 

 

Anyway, it’s probably something where we’re never going to come to much of a consensus, and that’s fine.

 

I did find Al’s comments about the Disciplinary Wives Club and the extent of authority exercised by the wives to illustrate the problem we seem to have in defining what an FLR might be.  He stated:

The focus of discussion was always on "maternal style" F/M DD - in essence "to keep the husband well behaved". There was not really any significant discussion on the wife's leading the marriage in general or with absolute authority.

 

So, on other hand, there wasn’t much discussion about the wife leading or having absolute authority, yet the archetype they were always focused on was the “maternal”. To me, one of the defining characteristics of the maternal archetype is the mother is charge and child is not. It seems to be a very hierarchical relationship, with one having a lot of power and the other having very little.   

 

 

So, again, there doesn’t seem to be a clean way to characterize the extent of the wife’s authority.  Oh well . . . it’s not like the semantics really matter very much.

 

Near the end of last week’s discussion, Norton proposed a future topic:

 

We have recently gone through a change in how she spanks, as requested by me. She used to start and stop, lecturing me when she stopped. It never occurred to me, but that kind of spanking allowed me to be able to handle it better, and not loose control. Then recently, she spanked me without stopping for about 3 or 4 minutes. Within the first minute, I was quite overwhelmed, and had obviously lost control, kicking and making noise. It seemed to me that a much more effective way to spank, as I don't really want to feel in control. It does make a spanking much harder to take, but it also makes even a maintenance spanking an event I will not feel too blasé about, as I have in the past. Possible future topic?

 

 


(Glenmore, is that one yours?  The version I have isn't signed, so I wasn't sure.)

 

Alan concurred on making it a topic:

 

This might make a future topic. We have talked about various spanking styles or techniques, but never or not recently about their relative effectiveness. I suspect one style of spanking becomes habitual in mature relationships. But it could be eye opening to discuss which style, if any, works best in any given situation - and what style is most common or rarest. There are a lot of moving parts implied, such as the spanking tool(s) used, purpose of the spanking, the wife's preferred style, the history and experience of a couple, etc.

 

We can make that this week’s topic, though I may need others to carry a lot of the conversation because, as I’ve said many times here, Anne’s spankings tend to be very binary, without much variation in style or technique.  Oh, it’s true that the positions and instruments have varied over time, but overall style or technique hasn’t varied much. It’s always been hard, relatively long (usually between 200 and 300 swats), with no warmup.

 

She doesn't really do "quick" spankings?  They all seem to fall into a range of about 150 swats on the low end and around 300 on the high end.

 


Although I do feel that, in general, a real punishment spanking has to pass some threshold of severity and duration to get the point across, I can see how a very quick spanking could work for minor offenses.  Moreover, I can see how it might have a role in fostering consistency, since a spanking could be over and done in a minute or two, instead of always constituting a big "event" that takes a lot of time and effort on her part.



One thing that has changed a bit recently is some stopping between volleys to lecture. For most of our DD relationship, that didn’t happen very much.  Instead, she generally spanked at a steady, relentless pace, with few breaks and seldom any discussion. Over the last year or so, she’s started pausing a few times during the session to make her main points verbally.

 

It's hard for me to say much about how style might influence effectiveness as, like I said, ours are pretty binary, so I don’t have much to compare to.  And, the comparisons I can make aren’t that helpful when it comes to effectiveness.

 


One area where Anne’s approach may vary from others is around warm-ups.  The Disciplinary Wives Club website advocated easing into the spanking:

 

“Once he is across your knee, give him a few moments to get used to the fact that he is about to be spanked. Begin by giving a couple of hard smacks, then stop. The initial sting will be quite a shock to his system. If you were to keep on, he would struggle so much out of reflex action it would be difficult, if not impossible, to hold him in place. This pause after the first few whacks will give him a chance to mentally gear himself for the ordeal to come. Give him a few more hard smacks and pause again. He will have started to squirm, but the smacks will have been given before any serious movement takes place. His body will be very tense as he awaits the next round of spanks. Wait for him to relax, and tell him to do so. Then resume the spanking.”

 

For some reason, Anne has never been into the idea of warm-ups. Her swats begin hard and stay that way.  In terms of effectiveness, I often think that Aunt Kay’s advice was sound, as starting hard from the outset can cause me to very quickly “man up”.  From that point forward, it’s all about resisting the pain and trying to get through it, as opposed to really processing what is happening to me and trying to absorb a helpful lesson from it.

 

On the other hand, starting hard from the beginning can make for a very, very painful spanking, and one could argue that’s the whole point, right?

 

In terms of pace, Anne is pretty steady, giving a swat, usually with the bath brush, about every second or two.  What she hasn’t done often that I see depicted fairly often in spanking videos is a super-fast, concentrated volley of swats.  I can see how that could be overwhelming in the way Norton describes, though I would also anticipate that it might make me go numb even faster.

 

As I said, I don’t have a lot to talk about on this one, so hopefully many of you will give us your thoughts on style/technique, and effectiveness.  Does there tend to be one prevalent technique used, or do they very from spanking to spanking? If they vary, is there one technique or style you find particularly effective?

 

I hope you have a great week.

10 comments:


  1. Most spankings, whether maintenance or disciplinary, are over her knee with a wooden, DWC paddle. Alternatively, from time to time they might be bent over with the cane though. On those very rare occasions - probably no more than once in two or three years - when a much more severe punishment is warranted, this is likely to be a caning, strapped down over the bench, and might be preceded by a forced climax. This would probably be for the breaking of a very specific, agreed rule; such as incurring late charges by forgetting to pay a credit card on time, or a speeding ticket or something like that. Maintenance includes a warm-up, punishments don’t. TG

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am posting this a second time at Miss C’s behest.. our DD/ FLR began more than 50 years ago. Before the internet during a period where men were assumed to be” wearing the pants in the family! As a young adult, with absolutely no warning prior to a humbling scolding I was strapped into submission by my wife’s mom. When i was finally able to digest and then admit to my wife what happened she found my behavior something she wanted to assure would be ongoing.. The rules have changed and the list of spankable offenses has grown Miss C’s spanking style has been consistent. As we are now well into our 70s my behavior is much less likely to elicit her rath. But when I earn a spanking it is always memorable. She has been using the same strap her mom used and I am tasked with oiling the strap.Occasionally I will find the strap on a chair with the strap on a pillow, these can be because she feels I need punishment!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes the artwork showing 10 minutes and 100 swats later is indeed mine Dan. Thanks.
    A rhetorical question of course as after 100 spanks of the brush , she knows she is getting through!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I didn't realize that comment became this week's topic. Reposting my comment:

    I bet that nonstop spanking is the way to go for a lot of wives. They are often taking cues from their husbands about how to spank their husbands effectively. Nonstop is easy to understand how to do and it hurts. They just need to learn to keep going when it seems like the spanking is too much. For all our inconsistencies and faults, this is something my wife does well, always willing to use the heavy paddle or brush and to just go for a number or amount of time. It feels like she starts too soon after I bend over, which makes me nervous to look away from her.

    Adding to my comment, warmups aren't a thing for us. I think I'd like them, not because I want an easier spanking, but because my wife would have to decide when to up the intensity. One of my desires is for her to become more proactive and decision-making in DD, rather than just trying to do what I've told her is effective for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "For all our inconsistencies and faults, this is something my wife does well, always willing to use the heavy paddle or brush and to just go for a number or amount of time."

      Same here. From the very beginning, Anne was surprisingly comfortable executing on a plan to deliver a very, very hard spanking if it had been earned. The one thing that makes her stop "too soon" is even the slightest sign of blood. Often, the skin isn't really cut. Instead, it seems to be some micro-abrasion that is so small that there is zero sign of blood on a tissue a minute after the spanking. It's almost like the percussion forces tiny droplets of blood up through the skin. I've explained that it's just not that big a deal, but she does get squeamish.

      Delete
    2. My skin doesn't do that, but blood would certainly be an instant stop. I bet we'll never use a cutting or whippy instrument.

      Delete
    3. For a while, when we were pretty new to DD, I fell into the rabbit hole of wanting to experience instruments that would make me really, really want to avoid being spanked with them. So, I bought some rubber straps in various widths. They did prove to be terrifyingly painful, but they also were incredibly prone to cutting and breaking skin. (One of them, a ferule from cane-iac, also smelled like an old tire and made everything around it smell like a tire service shop.) Those all quickly migrated to the trash can.

      Delete
  5. A very effective technique my wife has used occasionally is spanking on one cheek repeatedly and usually the same spot. I usually end up pleading for her to pay attention to the other cheek but then she just gives the other cheek the same attention!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dan wrote: "I think the vast majority here are more or less on the same page with what a DD relationship is, but there is clearly no consensus around what distinguishes it from an FLR, and it seems clear to me that the connotations we draw from (or impose on) the term differ dramatically from one individual to another, perhaps especially with respect to whether and to what extent “led” has some dictatorial connotation."

    I had logged on to add a final comment on this subject - but saw that you had a new post up. So I will just add here that I do agree with your summation - that while we are all fairly consistent in our views about F/M DD, our respective ideas on what FLR looks like do vary considerably. It seems to be a very gray area with no clear consensus - and I would also say that it may be seen as a spectrum - or as overlapping concepts (which might also include Femdom in a Venn diagram of the three).

    I do think you make a valid point in noting that "maternal style discipline" is inherently hierarchical - and obviously suggests a certain amount of "female authority". As I stated in my last post on this subject: "as we all know - in any established DWC-style relationship, the wife will always have a special kind of authority in the marriage".

    I would absolutely say that is true - but obviously the degree varies. As some have said, their DD regimen is strictly for certain definite infractions, and otherwise, they are a modern partnership marriage. I would see this to be primarily DD on the spectrum. However, most of us in DWC-style marriages grant our wives the consensual non-consent right to spank us at their sole discretion in whatever fashion they choose - which is clearly further on the FLR spectrum. Whereas the far FLR end of the spectrum might be seen as a master/slave scenario (which I suspect is how some may view the concept).

    Definitely - a gray area concept that varies with individual views, definitions, and semantics.

    "A hundred swats in 10 minutes". Susan would easily be at 500 in 10 minutes. She spanks quickly and non-stop, while scolding most of the time during the spanking (she is always able to speak quickly and effectively on her feet - and it carries over into scoldings during spankings).

    In the very beginning, after reading Kay's "Tips and Techniques" section, she did utilize warm-ups - but that did not last more than a month or so - after which, she just started right in non-stop. She normally does start (especially for maintenance, preventatives, and attitude adjustments, and such) with a short (12') strap - for the first 50-75 or so - which does it make it easier for me to endure the hardwood that follows (another 50-75 or more). Her minimum number of swats is a hundred (as she has told me) - for any spanking, but it is often more (but usually not more than 200). They are usually otk - especially for maintenance - which she considers a bonding experience (even though she will still set my ass on fire, and leave me with tears in my eyes). Punishment spankings are much more severe - and I am usually perched on the bed on my knees so my ass has maximum accessibility - and then it is nonstop hardwood from the start - and it's going to be a couple of hundred. These are very difficult to endure - especially if it's been a while since my last severe spanking.

    --al

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hard, fast, and maybe long spankings definitely have a role in effective DD. You need to know your wife or girlfriend can deliver that kind of corporal punishment when required. And she needs to know that too. But ideally, they are just one of a repertoire of strategies that she uses. The main effect of hard and fast is severe punishment and convincing you that you don’t ever want to be spanked like that again (a lesson, alas, most of us soon forget). So there is some learning and perhaps enduring behavior change in being spanked that way.

    However, longer discipline that incorporates scolding and some dialogue between you and her is much more oriented to deep behavior change (or maintenance of behavior change), as opposed to pure punishment.) Stopping to scold or ask questions makes discipline a communication experience, a dialogue between you and her. It can not only make her expectations and feelings very clear, but also tend to imprint on your memory the connection with her feelings and why you got spanked. My former GF was a master of the short phrase that she repeated over and over during a spanking, stopping only to ask me if I understood. (like” No is not in your vocabulary when you speak to me” or “Alan does not use the word fuck in my presence”) I remember waking up the next day with one of those short, blunt rules running through my still-awakening head, possibly a classic example of “internalizing” learning. The same GF told me there was a direct line between my bum and my brain, and I think she believed this( and she may have been correct)

    Again, I am not knocking “hard and fast. There is an important place for it, and it does probably make workable on-the-spot and other types of short to the to-the-point spankings. (When I have been spanked “hard and fast”, it's probably two to three minutes of brush to bum and maybe 5 minutes from “That’s it” to “You can get up now”. Every wife or girlfriend needs a way to do this. But if deeper communication between you and behavior change is the objective, there are better ways to get there
    Alan

    ReplyDelete

This blog is a curated resource for those genuinely and positively interested in DD and FLR lifestyles. Comments that are rude, uncivil, inconsistent with the blog's theme or off-topic may not be posted or may be removed. Please use a name or initials (doesn't have to be your real one) when commenting - it helps commenters keep track of who is "talking."