“Power is not a means; it is an end." - George Orwell
Hello all. Welcome back to The Disciplinary Couple’s Club. Our weekly on-line gathering of men and women who are in, or would like to be in, a Domestic Discipline relationship.
Once again, before we get started, I would like to thank the female commenters who have recently joined us and to extend an invitation to all others who may be inclined to move from “lurker” to “commenter” status. We like having you around.
I hope you had a great week. Mine was kind of mixed. The super cold weather finally let up a bit. It was nice to be able to go for a walk without having to bundle myself up like the younger brother in “A Christmas Story.”
On the DD and FLR front, for the first time that I can really remember, I came right out and asked not for a spanking, or for more strictness, but for a pause. I realized that I was still struggling internally with the family loss we experienced at the first of the year, and I just wasn’t in the right headspace to deal with disciplinary spankings for something other than really egregious conduct problems or with our recently implemented check-in procedure. I told Anne honestly how I was feeling, and she appeared to get it. Isn’t communicating like adults wonderful? I told her that I don’t expect to be in this negative headspace for that much longer (maybe a week or two), and hopefully that’s the way it plays out.
But, the situation was, perhaps a nice segue into part of this week’s topic. Norton had brought up the possibility of discussing something along the lines of the story, A Husband’s Essay, from the DWC website. He said:
"Dan, your last post was very compelling, and included two enthusiastic disciplinary wives who both talked about how much they enjoy disciplining their husbands. There was also a mention of "A Husband's Essay", which is about occassionally giving disciplinary level spankings even when the husband had done nothing wrong to earn one. This has also been referred to as a "therapeutic" spanking, which has been discussed on the blog before. One idea for a post is to see if any of us have tried it and/or how would we feel about it if the wife suggested it?"
The situation he referenced—giving or getting a disciplinary-level spanking even when the husband had nothing wrong—wasn’t quite the situation I was in last week. Mine was more getting a spanking for something relatively minor (in my mind) at a time when I was wrestling emotionally with something much bigger. There would have been nothing therapeutic about that for me at that time. Though, I can see how others might use spanking to work through emotional issues or to instigate some kind of catharsis.
But, as I told Norton, I’ve just never really liked that story and, in fact, it’s one of my least favorite pieces of content among all the DWC stories. Why? Well, I think it’s because my attraction has always been to what I see as the core elements of the DWC, i.e. accountability and consequences. In my view, A Husband’s Essay could easily be titled “All the Reasons I Like Spanking That Have Absolutely Nothing to do With Domestic Discipline.”
As I think someone pointed out, in the FAQ section on the DWC website, Aunt Kay was emphatic that, in her view, it was not best to reserve all spanking for disciplinary purposes in a DWC home. So, she was clearly more than open to non-DD spankings.
But, I think it’s also a fact that virtually all the content she chose to write about and put on the DWC website was about real spankings as real consequences for real bad behavior. A Husband’s Essay is, to me, the single nod to those other kinds of spanking that she wholeheartedly supported but chose not to make a focus of her group.
Al focused in on an another potentially “therapeutic” spanking scenario:
However, the idea of the wife spanking the husband (who has not "earned" a spanking) simply because she feels the need to spank - to relieve stress or frustration perhaps - is an interesting concept that we have not discussed as much as other topics.
For me, that one is a hard “no.” So, I guess in addition to refusing a spanking if either of us are intoxicated, we can add that one to my very limited list of exceptions to “anytime, anywhere, for any reason.”
Though, I recognize that maybe it’s not all that limited. Instead, it reflects that, for me, the whole attraction to the dynamic needs to be tied to accountability and consequences. I have exactly zero interest in experiencing a very significant amount of pain just because someone else feels like inflicting it.
That discussion, and my observation that the WordPress version of the blog seemed to be attracting a lot of BDSM interest, led Alan to propose a somewhat broader topic:
There may be a future blog topic in the apparent confusion with F/M DD spanking and master/slave-femdom -BDSM It would be interesting for folks practicing or interested in spanking within a domestic discipline framework to discuss and explain the key differences felt between DD and BDSM. Many consider DD spanking to be another branch of the BDSM umbrella that comprises DD. I don’t. Dan doesn’t, and I think many others feel similar. Yet nowhere I know has anyone articulated clear differences. Spanking, for example, is common in BDSM; indeed, often, it seems central to BDSM. But to me, DD spanking has little in common with BDSM as it is commonly described. The comments Dan mentions above from Femdom interests illustrate the practical nature of the issue. Many in the BDSM community see no difference between what we practice and what they do. Can we move the needle a little?
So, let’s combine that with Norton’s suggestion about “therapeutic” spankings to explore exactly what it is that distinguishes a DD/DWC relationship from everything else? Or, is it really distinguishable?
To me, it clearly is, even if I can’t lay down a precise definition that encompasses all DD relationships and none of anything else.
Though, I don’t think it’s a purely binary thing. There are lots of variations in these relationships and, as we explored during our most recent explicit exploration of BDSM back in May of last year, many do incorporate BDSM elements into their DD/DWC relationships.
To me, maybe it boils down to two (sort of three) questions:
· To what extent is there a core element of accountability and punishment, i.e. real consequences for real misbehavior, and to what is extent is that element “real” versus just an element of some kind of scene or role play; and
· Is the erotic element, which I fully accept is a part of virtually every DWC-oriented relationship, the central motivation or goal?
I brought up—based on some real recent comments—what I see as something that is pretty clearly not on the DD side of the line, i.e. a scenario where he gets off on being spanked, and she gets off on giving spankings, so they do it every day regardless of behavior. To me, that is just plain old S&M.
In response, Alan added:
“But the question I raise is not -what are the degrees of difference--but is not the difference one of a kind? As many have noted re DD, it must be real and ( con sensually ) non-consensual to work.”
I’m not sure I understand 100% what he means by “is not the difference one of a kind?” So, Alan, if you wouldn’t mind, can you explain that a little more?
So, let’s wrap up these threads into one topic on what distinguishes DD/DWC-style relationships from other relationships and activities that include spanking. Or, as Al, put it: “This is an interesting direction - a post/discussion about the differences between true DD (DWC-style, for example) and BDSM - and perhaps the overlap as well.”
As a subset of that, we could talk about Norton’s reference to “therapeutic” spankings. On that one, Al had observed that he thought of “therapeutic” as being the same thing as “maintenance.” I don’t see them quite that way. I used to see maintenance as something that was pretty much outside the DD/DWC paradigm, but Al has convinced me that I’m wrong about that.
Although it probably is a gray area, I get the role in plays in reinforcing the couple’s respective roles and the overall DD/DWC dynamic. I see the dynamics in A Husband’s Essay as scenarios in which spanking is being used to serve an entirely different purpose, i.e. some kind of therapy or stress relief for either the spanker or the spankee. But, I’ve very interested to hear whether others see it differently.
Have a good week.
Dan, you said you "get the role DD plays in reinforcing the couple's respective roles and the overall DD/DWC dynamic", and if spanking is used for stress relief or a kind of therapy, then it's being used for an entirely different purpose. Maybe so, but for me, maintenance spankings do reinforce our respective roles, and also provides stress relief, which could be seen as a kind of therapy. Several differences between BDSM and DD are......
ReplyDelete1) BDSM is primarily for sexual enjoyment and excitement.
2) F/M DD is about changing behavior, setting limits and accountability
3) BDSM is for Kinky sexual fun, while F/M DD is maternal and family oriented
4) DD encourages couples to become more intimate, honest, and loving.
5) F/M DD helps men learn to be more sensitive and vulnerable, and women to be more confident and assertive.
6) F/M DD ends arguments
7) You can pay a pro to with BDSM, but real DD requires a real relationship.
8) It's a good idea to have safe words with BDSM. Not necessary with F/M DD.
To me, of the 8 items in your list, there is only one (maybe sort of two) that truly distinguishes DD from BDSM. To me, the second item--setting limits and accountability--is not a part of most BDSM at all, so it is what truly makes DD different. 6) probably also has little if any application to BDSM, but I kind of see it as a subset of 2.
DeleteI could see how an arrangement with a very skilled pro might also entail setting limits and accountability, though I suspect it would take a long-term engagement with such a pro to make that very effective, and it likely never would rival what we get with real relationships.
I wasn't present on this site for a long time, because we have transformed our relationship from FLR to Femdom (BDSM). Now I enter first time in few months, and the topic is just about it!
Delete@Norton you are pretty much correct, but I would like to go deeper into soanking and safeword topic.
Safeword is a fundamental difference. It's very rare that people play without safeword. When you do it, it' s considered a hardcore. We tried to continue not using it, but for some practices it's just mandatory (shibari).
Crying - quite normal in FLR spanking. In BDSM parties crying means stop even when safeword was not verbalised.
Implements - in BDSM people use mostly floggers and whips. Canes and paddles are rare. Belts as well.
Goal - in FLR you corrent the bahavior, maintain the authority, punish. In BDSM it's about enotions and feelings. Spanked person should go deeply into subspace. And the the outcome is different. If you get into the subspace, you will be there ling after the spanking ends. You will feel very obiedient for many days even though spanking might be lighter than in FLR.
My wife - this is the main difference. She is now very much aroused when disciplining me. She has become a real Domme, sha takes what she wants in life and in bed. She become friends with other Dommes, she learned to enjoy domination and takes any chance to do it.
I strongy encourage you to try it. Adding BDSM to existing FLR, so precisely making her a Domme and becoming her submissive, is a mind-blowing change.
YesMyMistress, agreed! Adding it in has many good effects!
DeleteL.
ReplyDeleteI think that to some degree, it’s simply a matter of intensity. I’ve been interested in spanking for many years - at least back to my teens, I’ve always been equally happy on either side of it and it was definitely sexual in nature. I met my - now - wife through this common interest and, as I’ve recounted before, we morphed into a true DD relationship within a year - which may not have happened if we hadn’t discovered the DWC website. I still crave - and get - maintenance spankings reasonably regularly. These are not particularly severe but always end up pushing me a little way beyond where I can comfortably deal with it. There’s still a sexual element in this for me, although perhaps not as centrally as there used to be, and I completely agree with Norton that it helps to reinforce roles - I find if I go too long between these, my behavior towards her does deteriorate a little. A disciplinary DD spanking is a completely different thing. Physically, in intensity it goes far beyond anything I would want to experience and while I think many of us agree it shouldn’t be given in the heat of the moment, she is likely annoyed or upset with me in some way so is working off her anger rather than having fun. So I think it’s perfectly possible for a relationship to encompass both BDSM and DD elements, I don’t feel that they conflict or are incompatible with each other. Any particular spanking is going to fall clearly into one camp or the other and I don’t think there will ever be any doubt as to which.
I like Norton’s bullet points and would like to add my thoughts.
1) BDSM is primarily for sexual enjoyment and excitement. Agreed
2) F/M DD is about changing behavior, setting limits and accountability Agreed
3) BDSM is for Kinky sexual fun, while F/M DD is maternal and family oriented As I’ve said before, I have a huge problem with DD being in any way maternal - probably because (1) I grew up in a time and place where there was no corporal punishment and (2) equating my wife to my mother in any way at all is quite impossible for me. Other than that I agree with this point.
4) DD encourages couples to become more intimate, honest, and loving. I’m not sure about the cause and effect on this one, I think maybe intimate, honest and loving are the prerequisites for DD rather than a result of it.
5) F/M DD helps men learn to be more sensitive and vulnerable, and women to be more confident and assertive. Maybe on the first, agree on the second.
6) F/M DD ends arguments. Definitely
7) You can pay a pro to with BDSM, but real DD requires a real relationship. Agree
8) It's a good idea to have safe words with BDSM. Not necessary with F/M DD. Agree.
TG
The focus on intensity is interesting, but would you agree that in the way you describe it, the difference in intensity is because spanking is a means serving two very different ends. In other words, it's not the intensity that distinguishes DD from BDSM but, rather, than the former involves a different goal and the intensity is a reflection of that?
DeleteI guess you could look at it that way. The two spankings certainly have very different aims, one is a kind of sexual pleasure through application of a relatively small amount of pain, while the other is behavior modification. True behavior modification is only going to be achieved if the intensity is at such a level that the spankee REALLY wants to avoid a repeat. So yes, I guess you could argue that the intensity is a reflection of the aim. TG
DeleteI suppose you can get pretty much all the benefits by combining them.
DeleteL.
ReplyDeleteI think that to some degree, it’s simply a matter of intensity. I’ve been interested in spanking for many years - at least back to my teens, I’ve always been equally happy on either side of it and it was definitely sexual in nature. I met my - now - wife through this common interest and, as I’ve recounted before, we morphed into a true DD relationship within a year - which may not have happened if we hadn’t discovered the DWC website. I still crave - and get - maintenance spankings reasonably regularly. These are not particularly severe but always end up pushing me a little way beyond where I can comfortably deal with it. There’s still a sexual element in this for me, although perhaps not as centrally as there used to be, and I completely agree with Norton that it helps to reinforce roles - I find if I go too long between these, my behavior towards her does deteriorate a little. A disciplinary DD spanking is a completely different thing. Physically, in intensity it goes far beyond anything I would want to experience and while I think many of us agree it shouldn’t be given in the heat of the moment, she is likely annoyed or upset with me in some way so is working off her anger rather than having fun. So I think it’s perfectly possible for a relationship to encompass both BDSM and DD elements, I don’t feel that they conflict or are incompatible with each other. Any particular spanking is going to fall clearly into one camp or the other and I don’t think there will ever be any doubt as to which.
I like Norton’s bullet points and would like to add my thoughts.
1) BDSM is primarily for sexual enjoyment and excitement. Agreed
2) F/M DD is about changing behavior, setting limits and accountability Agreed
3) BDSM is for Kinky sexual fun, while F/M DD is maternal and family oriented As I’ve said before, I have a huge problem with DD being in any way maternal - probably because (1) I grew up in a time and place where there was no corporal punishment and (2) equating my wife to my mother in any way at all is quite impossible for me. Other than that I agree with this point.
4) DD encourages couples to become more intimate, honest, and loving. I’m not sure about the cause and effect on this one, I think maybe intimate, honest and loving are the prerequisites for DD rather than a result of it.
5) F/M DD helps men learn to be more sensitive and vulnerable, and women to be more confident and assertive. Maybe on the first, agree on the second.
6) F/M DD ends arguments. Definitely
7) You can pay a pro to with BDSM, but real DD requires a real relationship. Agree
8) It's a good idea to have safe words with BDSM. Not necessary with F/M DD. Agree.
TG
Therapeutic seems to fit us. On many occasions Dev has spanked me not because she wanted to but because I needed it. ! JR
ReplyDeleteWe really haven't explored that much, probably cause I tend to "need it" only when I'm carrying around some guilt or disappointment in myself about something I did.
DeleteI feel exactly the same. J
DeleteAll spankings in our house are delivered as a result of poor behaviour of some type on my behalf. There is no role play, no dressing up, no sceneing. The vibe is adult to adult rather than in any way maternal. We don’t do maintenance spankings although we have tried a weekly ‘check-ins’. There have always been some transgressions to deal with during those check-ins but my wife is less keen on being tied to a scheduled event. My wife has said she would be willing to spank me at my request (if I were feeling guilty about something that she didn’t know about or had not picked up upon or if I felt I needed it) but I have never yet made that request. It feels to me that would be even harder that owning up to some misbehaviour which I have done once, and which was extremely embarrassing & uncomfortable.
ReplyDeleteThe erotic element was central right at the start of our DD. I have always had that kink Initially I explained to her that the erotic element was satisfied by the spanking process and a relatively mild spanking. I then explained that a real spanking would hurt much more than would be erotic and that she could tie to misbehaviour. I would still enjoy the fantasy part of it but that she would have the opportunity of managing my behaviour through the threat and reality of ‘real’ spankings. That balance has worked for many years as she does not hold back.
I have no real idea of the motivations around BDSM. It always seems like a great deal of work to set up a scene. I suspect with many participants that there is considerable overlap with DD and visa-versa although DD feels like it is grounded in reality rather than fantasy. TB
"It feels to me that would be even harder that owning up to some misbehaviour which I have done once, and which was extremely embarrassing & uncomfortable."
DeleteI really don't know whether it's harder. Although it sometimes takes me a while, I'm not terrible at owning up to my own failings. Though, it depends a lot on how much they reflect something where I've violated my own standard in some way, such that I'm not embarrassed about violating a rule but, rather, about letting myself down. But, what I'm terrible at is owning up them in a context in which I know it is likely to get me spanked.
Dan,
ReplyDeleteI admit I am a little confused. What is the question we are discussing?
L.
Seems like there are 2 related topics. One of them is what are the differences between DD and BDSM. The other is the Husbands Essay, or theraputic spanking, which we discussed in the previous week. Because it isn't intended to be putative, is it DD or BDSM? At least that was how I interrupted it.
ReplyDeleteThat was my comment above
DeleteDan wrote: “But the question I raise is not -what are the degrees of difference--but is not the difference one of a kind? As many have noted re DD, it must be real and (consensually) non-consensual to work.”I’m not sure I understand 100% what he means by “is not the difference one of a kind?” So, Alan, if you wouldn’t mind, can you explain that a little more?”
ReplyDeleteI hope to have time to develop this issue more fully. But Trump has chosen to bring down the international financial order this week, so I have some knitting to do.
But, in nuce, BDSM relates to DD only in some overlap in methods --tools, not purpose. BDSM, at its core, is performative, while DD, at its core, is self-actualization and existential. The two are distinct phenomena: BDSM is theater, and evanescent DD is life and real; BDSM‘s objectives are pleasure and erotic; DD's objectives are intimacy and behavior change. Erotica is a tool in DD, but it is the objective of BDSM. Eros is the road to DD; but it is the destination of BDSM
Perhaps most striking is the role of consent. Consent is crucial in BDSM, signifying its essential performative ethos. Safe words are sacred words in BDSM; DD, however, seeks “consensual non-consent “as perhaps its highest end. BDSM, at its best, is DD on training wheels.
"Trump has chosen to bring down the international financial order this week, so I have some knitting to do." I was so pissed on Friday, as the markets were finally recovering nicely from an AI-related sell-off on Monday. Then, Trump confirmed he was going to impose tariffs on Saturday, and everything sold off again. But, I figured he was bluffing and blustering--because that's what he does--and I bought selectively on Monday morning as the market was still selling off over the tariffs. By the end of the day, he'd suspended the tariffs on both Mexico and Canada. It's going to be four years of this shit, with the market on a roller-coaster because of every idiotic thing that chaos agent says and does. But, you can make money off of it if you just remember that 90% of the time he is lying or bluffing. Wouldn't you actually love to play poker against him? He has like two moves, and that's all he does.
Delete"Eros is the road to DD; but it is the destination of BDSM." I love that!
Re: self-actualization, I think some in BDSM would push back and say that it too involves self-actualization, as some of it focuses on fantasy fulfillment and on losing one's inhibitions and openly exploring things that others won't because they are embarrassing or transgressive. I do give them credit for that but, as you said, I think the end states they are aiming for are much different.
I've always known that "consensual non-consent" is a big, big part of the dynamic for me and that it's an alien concept in BDSM. But, you're right, they're not just different in that respect. It is that difference that makes them PROFOUNDLY different. Thought, part of the difference also reflects the practical differences. Because BDSM (often) involves made up scenes and play-acting, it is much, much more difficult in their dynamic to confuse genuine protestations and calls to stop with play-acting.
Its hard for me to believe that this behavior -- given the age of this bull and its high concentration--will not unleash a bear stampede at some point in the next two years. . The losses could be historic when it comes ( an observation, not a prediction). And the damage to international market structures will be substantial and enduring. If your investment horizon is long ( think up to 10 years), then hang on and enjoy the ride. But lots of folks are going to be headed for the exits as the chaos continues. There are going to be lots of opportunities ahead.
DeleteAlan
It's definitely unpredictable. My biggest concern is a resurgence of inflation. Tariffs are inflationary. Mass deportations will tighten a labor market that is already at or close to at full employment, which is inflationary. And, tax cuts are inflationary. So, any of his big three policy areas could lead to higher inflation, and he''s doing all three at once. I'm watching interest yields and other inflation measures like a hawk. The second it looks like the Fed may have to start raising rates again, I'll be taking a lot of $$ out of the market and waiting on the sidelines to step back in after he makes a shambles of the market.
Delete" I'll be taking a lot of $$ out of the market and waiting on the sidelines to step back in after he makes a shambles of the market."
DeleteI will be waiting for you when you arrive. Cold beer?
Alan
For sure! Any time!
DeleteI hope I am on-topic. I admitted in an earlier comment that I don't know exactly what question I am trying to answer.
ReplyDeleteI suppose J. and I were always comfortable with the situation that there was a large amount of overlap between the types. Spanking functioned as a discipline tool to keep him on the straight and narrow, as well as being the "escape valve" when he had pushed me too far, even when I couldn't analytically say why he had messed up. We used it for something resembling therapeutic purposes.
However, a part of it was nowhere near disciplinary in its purpose (on days when he hadn't done anything out of order). The female genitalia enlarge and lubricate when aroused. J. had a very big willy and so this was necessary. I spanked him every evening. Occasionally, we cut corners and had a follow-up baby-making session without a spanking, which I quickly regretted: it was painful! Therefore, I would roll him over in bed and spank him before the next baby-making session. This left both of us aroused, me particularly so when he winced and screamed in pain. I believe women should not feel bad about admitting this: all too often, women are made to feel guilty for this, and so spanking habits fall by the wayside.
I suppose key to making spanking and its nebulous nature work for us was not overthinking it and being comfortable with the fact that it was unclear what was what (rather than say insisting on everything being exactly measured out according to the gravity of the offence). The end result was that we had a very harmonious marriage from start to finish and conceiving five children very quickly.
L.
I absolutely love the way this was worded - “BDSM relates to DD only in some overlap in methods --tools, not purpose. BDSM, at its core, is performative, while DD, at its core, is self-actualization and existential. The two are distinct phenomena: BDSM is theater, and evanescent DD is life and real; BDSM‘s objectives are pleasure and erotic; DD's objectives are intimacy and behavior change. Erotica is a tool in DD, but it is the objective of BDSM. Eros is the road to DD; but it is the destination of BDSM”.
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely how I would define the key distinct difference between the two.
I was unable to respond to everyone’s comments on the last post but I did enjoy reading them. My husband and I actually stumbled into something a couple weeks ago. I have this beautiful leather tawse that I had been reserving for serious offenses. That week, at his check-in, he had earned an intense spanking due to a series of misbehavior that he knows is unacceptable. Largely due to his past, which I’ve touched on before, there are times when an intense spanking can become too much for him mentally. This happened to be one of those nights, so rather than forego the punishment or postpone to later in the week, I compromised and said he could handle being spanked in segments of five hits. So until I thought he had learned his lesson, I was going to give him a ‘layered’ spanking. Throughout the week, at any point when I told him to bend over and drop his pants he would have to accept it and obey immediately.
This happened to fall on a week where we got snowed in so there were plenty of opportunities to keep him sore.
This past check-in we discussed whether or not he preferred this layered spanking method or one long spanking during check in. He said that he preferred the layered method as it felt like it kept our dynamic more active thoughout the week and in the day to day.
In addition, he suggested that I start working up from just five strokes to vary intensity and every couple of weeks push him to a higher number.
Honestly, that admission from him alone has had me feeling ecstatic and closer to him.
As for me personally, I’ve preferred the layered method as it feels like it sustains a level of intimacy and vulnerability on a daily basis that I feed off of from him. Considering I used to doubt him even wanting our dynamic to him initiating being more active and actively asking me to push him, we’ve come a long way.
Im excited to see where/how it evolves.
Miss E,
DeleteWe have not explored the ‘layered” spanking as you describe it. But one thing she is doing more of that seems related is what could be termed a “serial” spanking. It’s one long spanking that has lasted several hours but usually is much shorter.
We have talked about it and made it a sort of musical progression with her controlling the music. It starts with a scolding and hand spanking, followed by a corner time of long to short duration ( up to her) followed by another spanking with some instrument ( maybe a brush), and more scolding mixed in, followed by more corner time. This can go on as long as she wants. It is more of a game than severe discipline so far. But it would lend itself to discipline easily. She has administered real discipline this way -hard spanking interrupted with short periods of corner time followed by more spanking. But these are not drawn out, and the corner time is more for letting my bum recover. There is a psychological force to this kind of serial spanking that isn’t present in regular spanking. Then no matter how severe it is, I know it will end soon. But serial spanking can go on for a long time, and I don’t know when it will be over. That plays with the male mind in a good way
Alan
"Considering I used to doubt him even wanting our dynamic to him initiating being more active and actively asking me to push him, we’ve come a long way." That sounds like a great affirmation that the two of you really are on the same page.
DeleteI've enjoyed reading the comments - some really interesting takes. I also really appreciated:
ReplyDelete"Eros is the road to DD; but it is the destination of BDSM."
I would judge there to be quite a bit of truth in that statement. Although "real discipline" and "real punishment" for misbehavior is the purpose and goal of DD, for almost all the husbands (if not all) and undoubtedly at least some of the wives, there is undoubtedly an underlying sexual component as well - if not overt, then certainly psychologically. I often think of it as "psycho-sexual" - in that there is no overt sexual stimulation when my wife is blistering my behind (and if there was beforehand, it is quickly extinguished) - but, as has been noted many times before, the idea of being spanked can be quite sexually exciting before and even after a spanking - even if not during the spanking. And, on occasion at least, some disciplinary wives do become sexually excited while administering a sound spanking (I can personally testify to this, and I have others report such as well over the years).
And, for some at least, there is some crossover between strict DD and recreational spanking (as a subset of BDSM). There are couples who practice genuine F/M DD (DWC style) - but also engage in recreational spanking as well. Even Aunt Kay supported the idea that it was ok to "have fun" with spanking (in one of the FAQ questions) - and she certainly spanked her share of men who came to visit (by all reports). This is obviously something that would vary by couple - some DWC couples might enjoy some occasional recreational spanking activities (privately, with other couples, spanking parties) - others might find it completely contrary to the concept of DD.
Just a couple of thoughts... --al
When I wrote this, another thought occurred to me I would like your thoughts on this since you have thought about may of the things I think about ( and our wives are long-lost sisters). I feel less sure about this than my ideas on BDSM. But here goes: there is also a sharp distinction between alpha males and beta males (and I will let those terms define themselves for the moment)
DeleteAlpha males seek and often obtain DD relationships, whereas beta men usually struggle to do so. Alpha men also characteristically don’t want to stop being alphas. They do want to stop being jerks with woman and in their relationships. Part of the alpha’s success in achieving a DD relationship is that women are more comfortable most of the time with the alpha type -and at least some women find “taming” the alpha a fulfilling role. ( for both of them)
Beta males, in contrast, often have trouble finding women who want to give them the slave-mistress relationship that many seem to like. Women don’t want slaves; they want men who behave and know how to obey, And maybe men who accept discipline, But not men who look to them for a sense of self and purpose. Alpha men need their ego controlled, but they don’t want their ego to be absorbed into another.
This could go on, and I have not fully thought it out as mentioned. But it does seem plausible that the differences between alpha and beta—while ostensibly seeking the same thing—are strong and deep. One cannot simply think of alphas and betas being on different parts of a continuum—or if the continuum is the correct paradigm, then the distance of type between the two is vast.
I believe there are many beta males and none of this should be implied as criticism of them. But tens of thousands of males ( at minimum) seek DD-style relationships. Relatively few apparently succeed. My speculation is that those who do succeed are disproportionately alpha.
Thoughts?
I'm not wild about terms "alpha" and "beta", particularly now that the latter in particular has been so politicized. But, I'll use them here, since I don't have anything better.
DeleteWhen I first started this blog, I assumed that most men in DD relationships were alphas who were attracted to DD because they wanted to sand off some of the excesses that come with being an Alpha. As you said, Alphas have strong egos but sometimes are self-aware enough to understand the problems those strong egos can create for them, so they are attracted to DD because it brings more balanced to a personality that can be characterized by its excesses.
But, it turns out, a lot of that was probably projection. I was very surprised when I dod some polls early on and found that the split between men who saw themselves as liking to lead in most aspects of their non-DD lives, on the one hand, and those who liked to follow, on the other, was about 50-50. Now, polling on this blog always was very unscientific given the very limited and unrepresentative viewership, yet it did surprise me just how many men seemed attracted to the DD lifestyle but did not seem to see themselves as alphas.
So, it seems that both types are attracted to DD. But, I suspect that those who are attracted to Femdom are far more in the beta camp. As you said: "Alpha men need their ego controlled, but they don’t want their ego to be absorbed into another." That isn't going to be a good match for a very strongly dominant woman, i.e. one that is more in the Femdom camp than DD or even FLR.
And, I assume that the same is true for that Femdom-inclined woman. She is going to want a man she can not just tame but make truly submissive. I think Alpha men who are into DD may be into certain things that can be thought of as submissive, but it's a long way off from a "Master-slave" kind of thing.
I don't really know whether it's true that Alpha males seek and often succeed in getting DD relationships, while betas want DD relationships but fail to get them. For one thing, I'm not sure how many women there are who are interested in DD, or have even thought about it, until their current husband somehow introduces them to it.
But, I do think that a majority of women are more attracted to confidence and even brashness than to subservience. The true submissive is probably better off looking for a woman who is already into Femdom, or maybe introducing Femdom elements into the relationship if an already kinky wife sees so inclined. In any case, it seems like for a truly beta/submissive man, the access point into what he is looking for is more likely to be BDSM/Femdom than DD.
And, of course, as some of the discussion above shows, none of these categories are carved in stone, and people can move from one dynamic to another. In our case, I think my interest has gone from purely DD for many years to incorporating some additional FLR aspects.
Alan wrote:
Delete>"This could go on, and I have not fully thought it out as mentioned. But it does seem plausible that the differences between alpha and beta—while ostensibly seeking the same thing—are strong and deep. One cannot simply think of alphas and betas being on different parts of a continuum—or if the continuum is the correct paradigm, then the distance of type between the two is vast."<
This is a really interesting concept that I had not really given much consideration. I do think you (and Dan in his reply) - make a good point. Women, in general, do want a "masculine, confident, strong" man - so the wife's reaction to her "alpha" husband asking for corporal discipline to help keep his "alpha-ness" moderated is most often going to be much different that a "beta" husband asking his wife to for her to make him her slave in a complete full-time femdom mistress/sub relationship. (Of course, there are always exceptions).
As we all know, one of the biggest concerns that men have about approaching their wife for a DWC marriage is the fear of "seeming weak or unmasculine". Our hope is that she won't see it is as unmasculine - but will see it as us as being "real men" in acknowledging our need for discipline in keeping our alpha-ness moderated. And that when our wives do spank us - we hope that they see us as ""taking what we have coming" like man.
I have some additional thoughts as well - but will need to come back to them later in the day. Duty calls at the moment. --al
Interesting discussion. Part of the variety different couples desire in a DD relationship
Deletehas to do with how how much authority does the wife have, or want to have. In an FLR, it would seem she has the power to make decisions about almost everything. However, she probably doesn’t want a mistress / slave relationship. In most DD relationships, most of us men want her to have the authority to spank anytime, for any reason. Also, it seems that we want her to exercise her authority and remind us about it. But many of us wouldn’t choose to have her to make all the major decisions. So what were are discussing is not only about the difference between BDSM and DD, but also FLRs.
As I ponder the implications of the alpha vs beta distinctions, I realize the logic of my ramblings leads to the speculation that alphas will disproportionately seek DD/FLR relationships while betas will disproportionately seek classic BDSM relationships. I am aware that Dan's poll data doesn't support this inference. But the FLR allow a wife/girlfriend to decide how much power she wants to exercise -and this in turn amounts to deciding how much of an alpha male she want/desires. A woman is in complete control of how far she takes it -and the apparent experience that most women modify their control suggest to me that most women in DD relationships are comfortable with alpha males,but do want to conrol and modify some collection of behaviors.
DeleteAlan
Alan, it's tough to draw any solid conclusions from the polls. At most, I think they show that the blog readership was more split between "leaders" and "followers" (which I think were the terms I used in the poll, not "alphas" and "betas") than I had naively projected. But, it's very possible that many of those who identified as "followers" actually do gravitate toward BDSM, but that the content on this blog was close enough to the dynamic they want to scratch that itch a bit. It's also possible that some of them seek out DD relationships instead of full-on Femdom because they perceive that they might be able to get the former but their significant other might reject the latter.
DeleteFor "alphas", DD does seem to be the best entry point for both them and their significant others. The alphas likely want to have some boundaries and consequences imposed, so that they get the positives of being alphas without some of the negatives that can happen when their aggression/energy/assertiveness gets out of control. And, DD would fit better than Fendom or even some strong form of FLR for most of those married to alphas, because they too want to mitigate the bad aspects of the alpha's behavior, but not to such an extent that it would gut the personality traits that attracted her to him in the first place.
Norton, your comment shows how slippery a concept "FLR" and makes it clear to me that when we discuss it here, individuals use the term in such different ways that it's not clear we are even talking about the same thing, You said, "In an FLR, it would seem she has the power to make decisions about almost everything." I don't think of it that way at all, though it's clear to me that many here probably are closer to your use of the term than mine. I see FLR as being a broad spectrum. For some, it may mean that the woman is making some set of decisions on her own, but far from all. In a DD relationship, it could be as limited as she makes the rules about what is spankable, regardless of whether he agrees. Or, it could mean that the couple consults about most major decisions but, in the event of a tie, she wins. Or, at the far end of the spectrum it could be she is fully in charge and making most decisions, though at that point, I probably would characterize it as something closer to a Femdom relationship. But, it's tricky, because to me Femdom has this very strong sexual, Dominance/submission vibe that might be there in an FLR but not nearly to the same extent.
Delete
DeleteAlan wrote: "most women in DD relationships are comfortable with alpha males but do want to control and modify some collection of behaviors."
Well stated - and I would say that is my general impression from what I have read over the years in various forums - including the private DWC forum. I would agree that it is more likely that an alpha male might persuade his wife to try a DWC relationship, than it would be for a submissive/beta male to persuade his wife to take on a full time mistress/slave femdom marriage.
There is obviously some gray area in between - a DWC wife, for example, might employ anal discipline (pegging, butt plugs, etc) on occasion - depending on the relationship, even though anal discipline is more usually associated with femdom. Which leads me to the belief that it really is more about the attitude and mentality than it is the actual activities.
--al
I have shared more than once that our DWC lifestyle began when my wife and I swapped sexual fantasies one evening over too much wine. This was the evening I first mentioned a "mild fascination with being spanked" - which almost immediately led to a full-on DWC marriage. However - my wife's fantasy was an MFM threesome - although she quickly added that she did not believe she would ever be able to actually go through with it (gratefully - as I did not believe that I could either!).
DeleteNevertheless, over the years, out of curiosity I did research the subject. And one of the things I learned was that a wife who was allowed to have sex with other men was known as a "hotwife" (one word) - who would enjoy being able to have sex with other men than just her husband (whether alone or with the her husband present).
However, the motivation of the husband was a bit more complex. And there is an analogy here to the motivation of the man who wants to be in a marriage in which the wife spanks him.
The husband of a hotwife who is beta/submissive and experiences some form of sexualized humiliation in witnessing his wife have sex with a "more masculine man" is known as a "cuckold". (This is the "fetish meaning". The original meaning from the middle ages applied to any man whose wife had sex with another man - whether he knew about it or not). The sexualized humiliation is often accompanied by enforced chastity for the cuckold - and the cuckold is quite often subject to other aspects of femdom as well. There is a significant crossover between cuckolding and classic femdom.
However, other husbands - with absolutely no interest in humiliation or deprivation - but who find the idea of their wife having sex with another man to be hot in and of itself - are known simply as "hotwife husbands" (or sometimes "stags").
There is a significant difference in the motivations of the two types of husbands even though the role of the wife is essentially the same (in physical terms - although her attitude might be significantly different). Both are enjoying the sexual femininity of their wife - but one is doing it as a submissive beta experiencing humiliation - while the alpha male is simply enjoying the hotness of watching his wife in action.
This is obviously not to suggest that there is a direct correlation between F/M spanking (DD or BDSM) and "hotwifing" - but to point out that the motivations of the alpha and beta/submissive male can be quite different, however it manifests.
--al
I wouldn't be surprised if the "stag" personality type and some alphas in DD match up pretty closely. The uniting factors would seem to be an abundance of self-confidence and a stronger than normal sense of security. It takes a lot of confidence for a man to ask his wife for something like DD, and it takes a strong sense of security about the quality of the relationship and that it will survive such a request regardless of the answer. I've never experienced the hotwife dynamic, but I have to think that it takes a huge amount of self-confidence for a man to agree to let his wife have sex with another man, being secure in the presumption that she will still see him as her primary relationship. The cuckold has different motivations, since he's into the whole humiliation thing. For the alpha, however, he's secure enough in his position and his relationship with his wife to indulge her fantasy and maybe even be attracted to it himself. Like I said, I'm not speaking from experience.
DeleteI’m kind of with Norton on the DD versus FLR issue. I know there are certain levels of FLR’s and have read about them. I describe an FLR as the women having the final say in most decisions. My wife and I make our major decisions together, but for the day to day decisions, they are left to me. I’m financially better than she is, so I handle finances and she handles daily tasks that I’m not as good at. For me anyway, I think of an FLR as you wil handle all of the housework, yard work, day to day tasks , ect. You will hand your check to me and I will make all decisions surrounding our relationship. I will tell you when you are golfing ect. Ect. As far as Femdom, I think of cuckholding, face slapping, sucking my toes, diminishing him to garbage verbally and physically. I think there is a strong relationship between femdom and BDSM.
DeleteI look at DD and FLR differently as well. I often said here I would have greatly benefited from a full FLR when in my mid twenties. I would not want one now, as I have matured, make sound decisions on life and frankly my wife would outright refuse it even if I broached it. We have to remember that we are also married to someone we love and that we are grown adults making real life decisions that affect our futures and family. All of the talk is great and we can go back and dissect and debate until we are blue in the face. At the end of the day, we all have to be responsible enough to make important decision for our future. Sorry for the long winded statement.
T
T, your “long winded statement” perfectly describes how I view all this complicated stuff better than I could describe it myself. Probably most of us could have benefited from DD in our 20s, but very few young guys are mature enough to realize they need it.
DeleteI was always into spanking, but wasn’t even aware of DD until much later in life. In my 20s and 30s, I spanked many women, always hoping they would want to turn the tables on me. Sadly, that never happened. The I discovered the DWC, and a whole new world opened up. The next big awareness for me was discovering this blog. It has been extremely beneficial for us as a couple in normalizing and understanding real DD.
Yes , my twenties were wrought with insecurities and indecision.
DeleteLike you, I was definitely into spanking, due to my upbringing, I unlike you found DD early thanks to DWC. I was spanked by some ex girlfriends. One of them was a great spanker, but not for the right reasons. I agree that the blog is great at communicating one’s needs, but unfortunately this need of ours
Is way too limited to a small select group of people. I think if there was a bigger turnout then the perspective of each individual would shed light in different manners of DD. Kudos to Dan for the forum, but unfortunately one can only bring up so many topics surrounding F/M discipline without repeating some topics.
Agreed. J. always felt glad he entered into a DD marriage early and therefore didn't do many of the silly things many people do in their 20s.
DeleteL.
This weeks subject is irrelevant to me as I see our thing and BDSM on polar opposite spectrums. I agree with Dan on the alpha part above. I am definitely an alpha male. My wife was attracted to my ability to lead, believe it or not my arrogance to an extent, my confidence and my ability to make the right decisions for our family. My wife was not strong when I met her. She had come from a verbally abusive relationship with a man who had a high paying job but was a loser. It took a while, but she gained confidence with me and slowly overtime became the opposite of what she was. I had a fetish and we dabbled in spanking as foreplay. I like most guys, introduced her to DD. At first, she thought it would be “rewarding” me for bad behavior. It wasn’t until the first few thrashings, where I broke out in a sweat, for her to realize the difference in play and discipline. I had a bit of a mouth and temper when I first met her. She has thrashed that out of me. I implored her to not take any of my crap. I was never verbally abusive, but she hated when I raised my voice or would get animated. When this occurs now, she will look at me and tell me to lower my voice if I know what’s good for me. Obviously communication has been key, as I have stated to her to not even tell me to lower my voice but to go upstairs and bend over. Sometimes I will get a pass, but she’s been much better. I’ve been due for a thrashing for about a week, but life has been very busy. BDSM for me is nothing but play. It’s leather, whips, chains, ball gags, dildos, ect. It’s strictly play and for me is a total turn off. I like zero about the scene. They have safe words. We do not. I have never stopped a thrashing, no matter how much it hurt. I will move and writhe and flop about, but its punishment. There’s nothing fun about getting a true thrashing.
ReplyDeleteT
Your description of the way your interactions started, then changed as a result of DD, is pretty close to ours. The only real difference I see is I don't think there was ever an element of me making the decisions for the family. We've always, from the beginning, made most significant decisions together, and I don't see that ever changing. But, what did change was her assertiveness. As you describe, my wife lacked confidence when we met. Not to an extreme, but certainly my personality was much stronger and more brash. I think she felt bowled over by me, even if that wasn't something I was trying to do. Part of my "pitch" to her for trying DD was very much about trying to change that unhealthy dynamic.
DeleteMaybe I phrased the above wrong, but we make all major decisions together. My wife can’t be bothered with some of the mundane decisions of daily life. I agree with you in that my wife’s assertiveness has grown exponentially over the course of our relationship. She knows how to put me in my place quickly when needed.
DeleteT
T wrote: >"BDSM for me is nothing but play. It’s leather, whips, chains, ball gags, dildos, ect. It’s strictly play and for me is a total turn off"<
DeleteI don't disagree with you in principle, however I would just suggest that it is really not about the various "activities". It is conceivable that these type of items and activities could be used in the service of DD. It's really about the purpose and motivation for which they are used - for a sexual BDSM experience, or for the purpose of "real life" discipline and punishment. Just a thought... -al
T also wrote: "I think there is a strong relationship between femdom and BDSM".
DeleteI would even take it one step further. My take would be that femdom is BDSM, or perhaps more accurately, a subset of BDSM. --al