Hello all. Welcome back to the Disciplinary Couples Club. Our weekly meeting of men and women who are in, or interested in being in, Domestic Discipline and/or Female Led (FLR) relationships.
I hope you all had a great week. Mine was . . . surprisingly painful. Twice over.
First, I got spanked for one of those “small” careless things Anne and I agreed she would be stricter about. This time it was leaving the garage door open (again). Then I had a dental procedure that left me equally sore in one of my other cheeks.
So, I hope your week was more pleasant and pain-free than mine.
I thought we had a great discussion last week. I’m probably going to experiment more with posts that are more stream-of-consciousness and/or tied to things I’ve recently gone through or thought about as a DD husband, as opposed to our very well-worn topical format. But, I need to think through what that might look like.
In any event, I do have a topic in mind for this week, and I apologize in advance to TG, as I know it’s one he doesn’t like. But, maybe there will be something that stimulates some thoughts from him even if he doesn’t personally gravitate toward this particular DD model.
It results from new commenter Mrs.Terrapin/Mrs.Turpin (not sure which of those she intends to adopt) addressing some of my discussion points about Anne second-guessing herself when it comes to spanking for seemingly “small” things.
As I said in that post, Anne has told me in the past that when she’s angry, she often just doesn’t think about spanking as the best option to address whatever I did to piss her off. However, a recent discussion revealed that it’s more nuanced. With smaller things that make her angry or annoyed, but not livid, it turns out she sometimes does think about spanking me, but she often starts over-rotating on “fairness” concerns, or focus on whether I’ve been warned sufficiently and recently, and she ends up talking herself out of it.
Mrs.Turpin (I’ll go with that one until she picks) explained how her thought-process around disciplining her husband for similarly small issues became much simpler when she had an epiphany that most of his behavioral issues were, in one way or another, a form of disobedience or disrespect. When she spanked him for not using a coaster, it wasn’t really about not using the coaster but about him not obeying her instructions to use one.
She also addressed what I think is probably another reason some Disciplinary Wives hesitate in spanking for small things; they question whether they are being hypocritical, given that they too probably have been similarly careless or sloppy from time-to-time. She said that eliminated that concern by re-framing the issue as a question of disobedience. The part that relates to today’s topic was an extension of that dynamic:
This ties into something else he’s asked for (even if he’s not always thrilled about it when the paddle comes out!): a dynamic that mirrors realistic maternal discipline. And here’s the fun part—another epiphany I had is that real-life maternal discipline isn’t about fairness. A mom can spank her son for staying out past curfew without batting an eye, even if she stayed out late herself the week before. It’s not a relationship of equals, and that’s the point!
I've had several occasions over the past few years where my husband has tried to get out of punishment by arguing that it wasn't fair that he was getting spanked for something that perhaps I had also done myself in the past. I always enjoy the look on his face when I cheerfully reminded him, “You asked for maternal discipline, and you will receive maternal discipline. Life’s not fair, darling, and I’m the one in charge!” It is a moment that sets the tone: naughty boys are not peers with their maternal disciplinarians.
My enthusiastic response to her reference to the unequal hierarchy at play in a genuine maternal model led her to expand:
At first, I understood "maternal" almost exclusively in terms of
aesthetics -what I am wearing, what implements are used, how I lecture and what
words I use, and so forth. The aesthetics are an important part of it ... but
there is so much more than that - for example, saying "because I said
so" instead of explaining every rule or consequence. I don't know why this
took me so long, but one day it occurred to me that when I was doing
"motherhood for real" raising my kids, I didn't feel the need to
explain everything - "because I said so" was adequate for them, and
so now it's something that my husband hears often.
Another example of where thinking "maternally" was a game changer was when it came to how hard I was spanking. In a maternal spanking, a boy is being spanked by a woman who is larger than him and stronger than him. For my husband to experience that same thing, given that he is twice my size and way stronger than me, that means that what I was considering a severe spanking was probably too weak even for a warm-up. This has changed my technique, instruments, and positions; but now to my husband’s surprise I am able to get him to the feeling of genuinely being overwhelmed by the spanking. (Ladies, I know that we often are afraid to spank too hard, but once you really think through proportionally how much larger your husband is compared to a boy, you might realize that you can and should spank much, much, much harder and not feel bad about it at all.)
I could go on and on, because once I had this epiphany about what maternal really means, I have discovered dozens and dozens of small things over the years that have helped me better deliver the "maternal" that he was craving and needs, and it's been surprising that it's not all aesthetics (although that is important).
One note for the wives out there - your husband might be able to articulate, generally, what "maternal" means, but it wasn't until I got very intentional about thinking about all of these little details (and often springing them on him rather than giving him a ton of input) that we really seemed to achieve the maternal dynamic that he wanted - and that, truth be told, makes DD easier, less stressful, and more satisfying for me too.
I certainly fall into the camp of knowing I gravitate toward a DD relationship with a maternal vibe, yet I struggle to articulate exactly what that entails.
So, this post is in large part an invitation for Mrs.Turpin to expand on her epiphany about maternal-style discipline and the insights she came to when drilling down into the concept.
My inability to articulate exactly what I think a “maternal”-orientation entails is reflected in the spanking Anne gave me this week.
I often think what I want is a very “stern mother” demeanor, yet the spanking this week felt very maternal even though she wasn’t all that stern. The best word I can come up with is “business-like”. That demeanor was reflected even in the timing of her announcement that I was going to be spanked imminently. The garage door incident had happened a few days before, and I thought she probably would spank for it, but I didn't know exactly when. On the night it actually happened, there was something else we had planned for the evening. When I asked whether that was still the plan, she said very casually and matter-of-factly, "Yes, but we need to take care of your spanking first."
The casual but confident attitude was also on display during her usual pre-spanking lecture. This time, it was short and to the point. Anne sometimes (not always) starts a discipline session by asking me why I’m about to get spanked. Generally, I don’t really like that. She’s the one in control, so I feel it’s more effective when she tells me why she’s about to spank me.
This time, she began with the simple pronouncement, “You’re getting spanked for leaving the garage door open.” She did then ask why leaving it open is a problem, but she wasn't looking for a big speech or show of contrition. I responded with a short statement about recent thefts in our neighborhood.
She responded, “Right. And, since we have talked about this before, your are going to get a hard spanking for it.”
That was really it. Her tone was “matter of fact”. Her facial expression was neutral and business-like.
Then, she put me over her knee and gave me a hard spanking with the bath brush. It wasn’t among her hardest or longest spankings, but it was something I might once have seen as “disproportionate” to the relatively minor offense that led to it.
Something about her demeanor, and our recent discussions in which I’ve said I want her to be more strict, caused me to react differently than I usually do. I wasn’t just trying to “gut it out” or “man up and get through it.” I was, instead, trying to focus on, even as she was giving me one hard swat after another, that I was being spanked because this has, in fact, been an ongoing problem. I’d had ample warnings and even been spanked for it before. So, a hard spanking was appropriate and perfectly in line with what I’ve said should happen. In short, I was trying harder than I usually do to fully accept that I was being spanked because I deserved it and that it should be a hard spanking.
All that added up to a spanking that somehow felt more maternal.
My reaction also may have been different because I’ve been increasingly open with myself, and with Anne, about the extent to which the maternal element is something I want, even if I don’t understand exactly why I want it or even what exactly it is that I want.
It also may not be a coincidence that I had recently visited the town where I attended high school and that those were the years in which I was probably the most in need of strong discipline.
Anne knows that I feel like I didn't experience enough real discipline at that stage and that I want, or think I want, more of it now. And, based on the conversations we've had, I think she genuinely likes taking on more of that maternal role.
And, not just because it's good for me. There's a heavy element of, yes, it probably is good for me in the sense that I feel like I need it, but it's also good for me in the sense that I've had it coming for a very long time, it's good for me regardless of whether I want it, and she is very happy to give me exactly what I need and deserve.
Although I’ve been thinking more about this need for “maternal-style” discipline for a couple of years now, it’s surprising that it was not something I keyed in on when I first discovered domestic discipline via The Disciplinary Wives Club website; surprising because it was featured prominently on the homepage, which stated:
The Disciplinary Wives Club (DWC) is an organization whose purpose is to encourage the application of "Good Old Fashioned" spanking and other very traditional methods of discipline by wives and committed partners. It is our experience that the vast majority of relationships that have a maternal discipline orientation are truly happy, healthy and long lasting.
There were blurbs in the DWC pamphlets that were much more explicit as to the dynamic the DWC advocated, among them:
“Remember when you were a child, was discipline or punishment fun? No. So you must think of punishment as something which will have the effect of making him think quite a while before challenging you again. And keep in mind that he is not, in fact, a small child. He is a grown man and needs an extensive spanking.”
“You will have to learn to obey her and to do so cheerfully. I recommend to the wives that they avoid “play sessions” at first, until you have come to realize what her punishment sessions really mean. First, you have to learn that she can spank you until you are a “sorry little boy,” who wishes those spankings would be over a whole lot sooner.”
“You asked your wife to please take over your discipline. You have empowered her to assume the maternal role and have agreed to take the child role with respect to discipline. You want, more than anything else, for her to be powerful, assertive and in control.”
“You will have to put up with closer supervision than you are used to, and she will demand answers and evidence of your performance. This is perfectly normal and how it is supposed to be. If you feel resentful about this or don’t want that kind of accountability, remember how maternal discipline occurs in a ‘child -parent’ situation. The child cannot simply wiggle out of his mother’s watchful eye. If you are honest with yourself, you will admit that when you get your spankings, it is that bratty little boy part of you who is getting it.
I honestly don’t know when I first started consciously exploring how much my own desire for DD was based in a desire for maternal-style discipline. My first post that involved much personal reflection about it was in 2019, after I’d been blogging about DD for over six years, and Anne and I had been practicing DD for much longer than that.
It is only in the last few years that either of us consciously took things in that direction. But, I think we both may have been dancing around it for a while. Surprisingly, until recently in my mind I was the one who started taking things in that direction, but when I look back on some older blog posts, I realize that Anne actually may have been inching toward it before me.
A few years back, when we were briefly experimenting with more of what I would call “service” domination, she said something to the effect of she liked that giving me orders reduced me to a little boy who has no choice but to do what he is told.
Sometime after that, she compared
me to a teenager who mischievously pushes buttons just to do it, then is
surprised when mom finally does something about it. And, she said it knowing that getting my butt blistered for sassing my mother wasn't a part of my actual teenage experience.
Those kinds of statements kicked off more open discussions about it, though it's never been as explicit as the arrangement it sounds like Mrs.Turpin and her husband have, so I look forward to hearing more about their dynamic.
I would add one caveat about my sense of my own needs in this area: For me, I think what I crave is structure and authority, but it’s not wholly confined to “female” authority. Although I’ve been very resistant to male authority in work settings, that wasn’t the case in school, and I also think that in more domestic settings I might respond as strongly to male discipline as to female. Perhaps even more so, because I think the feeling that the discipline was being imposed on me whether I liked it or not might be even stronger.
But, that’s another thing that may be changing. I feel like what I need and want now does have a more distinctly maternal vibe that it did back in 2019, when my post on this subject said that I felt I needed “an” authority figure and not necessarily a “maternal” authority figure. And, although I think I might have given into any authority outside of work, I do think pretty much any older woman would have had a good chance of making me submit to a spanking had that been on offer.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this.
And, lest we take all this talk of mothers too seriously, I've been wanting to use this one for a while, and this seems like as good a time as any:
Dan,
BalasPadamThank you, thank you, thank you, for expressing exactly how I feel. I crave the maternal structure in this dynamic. To know that when I push her buttons there will be consequences is all I have ever wanted! I will send this whole thing to my wife and let you know where it goes from here. My hope is that I truly learn to regret it...lol.
David
Yes, please keep us updated.
PadamDan:
BalasPadamQuick clarification. If Mrs. Terrapin used the name "Terrapin" fifteen (15) times in last week's discussion, and never even once used the name "Turpin," I think we should take honor her choice.
Donn: Mrs. Terrapin/Mrs. Turpin used two different names on two different posts. I pointed that out and suggested she let me know which she preferred, Which she did after those "15 times" which were clearly just multiple comments entered under the same ID she entered when posting. I really don't need to be told to "honor her choice" when I made it clear multiple times that I didn't know which name she intended to use until she responded.
PadamSorry about that.
PadamI was not aware that she had been commenting during previous weeks using a different name. (The only instances of "Turpin" I could find last week were in your own comments.)
I am somewhat curious about your “service” domination you both tried.
BalasPadam-Alex Glass
There was a period in which Anne experimented with doing things like ordering me to sweep the floors, clean something, bring in things from the garage, etc. Basically just ordering me around on chore-like things. It wasn't something I was ever into. I will say that had we continued to pursue it, might have been a great tool for humbling and role-reinforcement, but it definitely was not something I saw as erotic. Anne, however, said that one thing she liked about it was she could see me struggle to repress the urge to tell her to fuck off when she interrupted something I was doing to tell me to something for her. Me struggling to submit to it was something she found attractive.
PadamThat’s interesting. Thanks for sharing. When I first brought up DD and spanking to my now wife I tried to get her to do a little of that. At least allow me to take over some of the household chores and if I didn’t then I’d get spanked. Never really took off.
Padam-Alex Glass
We've kind of gone back and forth. She has assigned chores, and the implication would be that if I didn't do them, I would get spanked. For us, I think it's fair to say that for us household chores have always had a pretty equitable split.
PadamAnother week another well timed discussion. On the maternal aspect, I have a blogger blog on this subject about 3 weeks old. It has an audience of the fleas on the dog the one man left behind. I won't link to it or promote on here out of respect to Dan. However as part of a post published today, based on writing a letter to Mrs GoodLife, I wrote the following: "I also want us to have a list of behaviours, applied to me, that when I engage in you get to chastise me". I further wrote "if the last 45 years of adult life have shown me anything it is I'm sometimes just an immature inner child that needs the discipline the actual child never got". I also added "I know it's counter-intuitive to parent your early 60's husband but I implicitly trust you to do it effectively and lovingly" (extracts slightly paraphrased and in no surprise Mrs GoodLife won't ever read it). Think that shows where I am and where maternal fits in with my needs. Cheers GLM.
BalasPadamYou mentioned that Anne pre-empted another event for your spanking. You didn't attempt to use the event to delay it?
BalasPadamHow did it feel going to the event with a warm behind? Driving there would be a 'pain' !
No, it wasn't an external event. Just something else we were going to do that night.
PadamFor me the maternal aspect of a spanking is very important I was spanked by my mother always otk bare bottom with a big wooden hairbrush so that is my favorite way to be spanked but my wife prefers me naked bent over the bed and using a cane on me she enjoys that swishing sound a cane makes!!..Soreassboy
BalasPadam
BalasPadamThis crosses over so many areas that we’ve discussed in previous posts. I don’t think I have anything to contribute that I haven’t said in the past, but perhaps drawing it all together in a single comment instead of bits and pieces spread over various discussions. You’re right that I am very uncomfortable with the link between DD and anything maternal, but clearly I’m in a minority in that. I grew up at a time and place, and in a community, where parental corporal punishment just wasn’t a thing. I really don’t remember any particular style of discipline, but I’d say that both parents were generally equally in authority over the kids. Although having said that, I don’t think I ever saw anyone get into any significant trouble. It just didn’t happen at that time and place. I know that some people say that men marry their mothers, but for me, equating my wife to my mother in any way would be impossible - they couldn’t be more different. So that’s some background that perhaps explains my antithesis. However, the other part of this is this whole discussion of obedience, which I think is possibly the best explanation of an FLR yet. Over the last three or four years since I discovered this blog, one frequent theme has been husbands looking for DD as a tool to control some segment of their behavior. This might typically be related to alcohol, exercise, weight, or - as in my case - to occasional and irrational flashes of snippiness. Secondly, there may be agreed punishments for breaking pre-defined rules and thirdly, I think that most of us have agreed that our wives have the authority to spank whenever they feel it is justified. I’ve been there over repeatedly forgetting to put things in the family calendar, and Dan’s garage door is another example. I feel that Mrs Terrapin’s observations about obedience open a whole different dimension and provide a pretty good definition of a true FLR. We certainly have areas where she tends to lead, and some where I do, but fundamentally we’re a partnership of equals. Any significant decisions are made together and the concept of “because I said so” is unthinkable. With Mrs Terrapin’s recent observations plus comments from others, I feel I finally understand when a relationship crosses into an FLR, and also understand the maternal analogy. TG
"I know that some people say that men marry their mothers . . ."
PadamDefinitely not me. If I'd married someone like my mother, we wouldn't have lasted three years, let alone the 30+ that Anne and I have been together.
I'm glad you got something out of the obedience aspect of the topic, as I knew the rest would be a turn-off for you.
This has been very illuminating for me as it’s helped me understand a different viewpoint much better than I did before. This is a big tent, we don’t all have to see things the same way so the fact that it doesn’t align with my specific outlook is certainly not a problem. TG
PadamI couldn’t agree more with Dan, if I married someone like my Mother, we would have split long ago. My wife is the polar opposite of my Mother, but can dress me down in a Maternal loving way just like my mother used to.
PadamT
"Because I said so" is a compelling concept to me, and if your wife has the authority to spank, that is all the reason she needs. We don't have a FLR, and her authority only extednds to issues within the relationship. We both enjoy being independent, and have separate friends, activities, and money. That said, many issues could be considered as part of our relationship, and I have never refused a spanking. We look at our DD as maternal, and to some degree, reparenting. There is no question that I have become much more mature as a result of her taking me in hand, and I have finally stopped acting like I should to live up to some male macho stereotype. Like so many others, when I first discovered the DWC, I was shocked to discover it was a real lifestyle, and could only imagine what it would be like. 25 years later, I finally had the courage and clarity to ask for and recieve what I have been craving for so long, and the results have been nothing short of life altering.
PadamAnd yes, in common with many others here, I would like more strictness and consistency, but to me that means being quicker to punish for a snippy mood and not the unilateral imposition of new rules. TG
BalasPadamWe all come to this DD thing from different places and this discussion really highlights that for me. My own mother was always strict but in a non- physical way, my father died when I was very young and my family was almost completely female led. I was educated by supposedly Christian men who beat us daily. I don’t crave the maternal aspect of DD at all, I just relish having a strong, strict woman to help me with boundaries & behaviour improvement. It feels like an equal relationship where the discipline that I need, is available from someone who I love & respect. Clearly there are ‘ups & downs’ but as well as discipline, I get the erotic side of my spanking need satisfied. TB
BalasPadamAgreed, if there's anything that's clear from a decade of discussion on this blog, it's that there is no one starting place or path that leads to a DD relationship and, honestly, the end points seldom look exactly the same either.
Padam
BalasPadamI discussed this with my wife. I don’t often do this but this was such an interesting discussion that I wanted to get her take on it. I think this may prove to be rather contentious, but I’ll put it out there anyway. First some background, we originally met through an early spanking website (in the last century.) So we started more in the D/s world, which I know we tend to stay away from in this blog, but we transitioned into DD within our first year together and have been in this lifestyle for about twenty five years. However, even though we haven’t been very active in the D/s world for years, it’s still something we’re aware of and my wife particularly has read widely and has extensive knowledge of it. So, just as this blog is about DD and has extended into discussion of FLR, there could be seen to be a parallel line that starts with what we might call adult play, goes through D/s, then ultimately reaches M/s - Master/slave, which can also be regarded as a form of ownership. (Where the master may be male or female.) When I told her about this current discussion including the aspect of “because I said so,” her immediate reaction was, “that’s an M/s relationship.” We discussed this further at some length and ended up with the conclusion that this represents a merging of the two lines (DD > FLR and play > D/s > M/s.) Her reaction to the idea that this was maternal was negative and even stronger than mine had been, and that it was classic M/s. As I said, I understand that this may cause some contention, but I thought it was worth posting. TG
I don't personally have a hard time equating D/s with FLR and even with some aspects of DD. Though, I always emphasize it's easy to equate any of these relationships if you're looking at practices divorced from motivations. To me, it's the motivations and goals that are usually the distinguishing factors. I do think that when you go from the wife enforcing rules to the wife making the rules unilaterally, it's not obvious why that isn't properly classified as some form of D/s. I think some would probably classify ANY kink relationship in which there is a conscious power differential as some form of D/s.
PadamBut, I don't quite buy the M/s premise, and I wonder whether your wife is putting it in that category precisely because she doesn't like the maternal angle. The problem I have with that is it seems to involve questioning someone's own assessment of what they are doing, why they are doing it, and how it feels to them. It's like, I used to get very bent out of shape, and I think rightly so, when the former Caged Lion (and there have been others) would suggest that DD is basically just role play or S&M and that the erotic motivation is the ONLY motivation in play. It's an opinion they could get to only by presuming that others aren't aware of their own motivations or are in denial about how they feel. That's kind of what an insistence that this must be M/s and must not be something maternal feels like.
(I'll also note that the in addition to the maternal reference I somehow missed or just glanced over on the top page of the DWC website, in that same section characterizing the DWC as about maternal-style discipline there was also an express disclaimer that the group was NOT about Master-slave relationships. Not that that answers things one way or another.)
PadamThat’s a good point, she did link the two things, saying why would anyone regard this as maternal when it’s clearly M/s ? Your point about each person having their own assessment of what they are doing is well taken though. Perhaps this is two sides of the same coin and the interpretation depends on the individual’s background. I think both her comment and yours imply that these interpretations are mutually exclusive. For those who grew up in an environment where corporal punishment was the norm - especially if applied maternally, this feels maternal, while for anyone with a history in the D/s community, it feels like M/s. (I can’t speak for those with neither background.) I completely agree that DD is not a form of kink, nor is it D/s, although I understand that it may have some sexual overtones for some people. I think that DD and FLR are two different things, although they may co-exist. Speaking for myself, we live a DD lifestyle but are not FLR. However, I believe an equally significant distinction exists between D/s and M/s, in that D/s exists in a session of activity while M/s is a 24/7 lifestyle. So I wouldn’t relate DD to D/s at all but I would certainly relate FLR to M/s - and would then see DD as potentially, but not necessarily, a part of an FLR. I don’t remember enough about the DWC website, it’s been far too long since I saw it, but the D was disciplinary - and I am completely in tune with that concept, I want and expect my wife to be disciplinary when necessary. I don’t remember if they espoused FLR to the “because I said so“ level. If they didn’t, then I’d agree that they were not interested in M/s. If they did, then I guess we have a difference in interpretation. TG
It becomes quite a muddle, doesn't it? Personally, I do think of DD as kinky behavior. The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition includes: "relating to, having, or appealing to unconventional tastes especially in sex." The "especially" language implicitly means that it can apply unconventional tastes other than sex, though it applies most especially to sexual tastes. The extent to which DD is sexual probably is in the eye of the beholder and undoubtedly varies by couple. For me, part of the energy associated with it--but not all--is erotic for sure, though the discipline itself is not inherently sexual.
PadamAlthough sometimes talk about DD and FLR existing on a spectrum, I kind of agree with you that they are two different things. I tend to see BDSM as involving a
"session of activity" as you put it, while I see D/s as something that could be a form of activity but could also be a relationship style. Like I said, it's a muddle. And, obviously one relationship could encompass things that fall into multiple categories. I have a friend (mostly on-line) who is in a M/f relationship that clearly is DD in some respects but D/s in others.
I mean to add, regarding whether the DWC espoused a "because I told you so" level of control, I think that's again a little muddled. One of the pamphlets has this paragraph:
Padam"Discipline is based on mutual understanding about the rules of behavior in the home and what to expect if they are broken. While you have the authority to set the rules, it all works out best if you discuss them with your husband and allow him to “negotiate” some of the rules, so he does in fact feel responsibility for them too. When a discipline session is called for, it must always be given. This is especially true when you are beginning your new journey as a DWC wife."
It seems to be close to an unconditional grant of authority, but with the caveat that it would, of course, be a good idea to discussion things with him to get his buy-in. Or, less charitably, to make him FEEL like his buy-in was sought even if it was not strictly necessary.
I too crave the maternal type discipline, when it's imposed upon me even though I might see it as unfair at the time. My wife had an injury to her right arm so she was unable for several months to give me the spanking I deserved. However, this week she felt it was healed enough to deal with my insensitive words that upset her. I really forgot how painful being paddled could be. The spanking was the longest I have ever had. She wasn't spanking as hard as she could but because she continued to paint my entire bottom red it was still sore the next day. .Over the last year I have developed a real fear of being spanked. My behavior has improved because of it but I still tend to say insensitive things to her. I know it's not acceptable and was reluctantly accepting of her giving me a spanking for it?
BalasPadamThose hard spankings after a long break are just brutal.
PadamNot unexpectedly, I've read the entire DWC website multiple times over the past year, in much greater detail than my first forays back in 2002-03.
BalasPadamYes, Aunt Kay certainly believed and promoted the "maternal dynamic" as part of the Domestic Discipline she preached. However, I think she was of somewhat "mixed mind" in this matter, as she certainly also promoted (repeatedly) elements from dominant/submissive (D/s) relationships. (She may have retained some of this D/s orientation from her and "Jerry's" earliest experiences and personal participation in the "spanking" and "D/s" communities of Northern California during the late 1980's and early 1990's.)
I particularly noticed Aunt Kay's particular orientation in the DWC's "Tips and Methods" (for wives who might just be establishing a Domestic Discipline lifestyle in their home):
"There are many men who entertain fantasies of being dominated . . ."
"Just remember that it is [the wife's] dominance and [husband's] desire to be submissive that puts him in the spankee position."
"[A] submissive man does not want a weak or lenient woman. He wants someone very strict and dominant."
"[A wife should] [a]lways remember the key traits of establishing a dominant [disciplinary] relationship."
There are roughly another four to five instances of Aunt Kay describing the wives, husbands and relationships as "dominant" and "submissive" in other parts of her writings on the website. I also note that Aunt Kay repeatedly used the term "scene" or "scening," argot in the D/s and BDSM communities to describe more sexual and therapeutic interactions (and even "parties") between dominants and submissives.
I'm not sure what to make of this "mixture." One hypothesis could be that it was simply the amalgamation of Aunt Kay's experiences with a broad range of disciplinary relationships. It might also be her acknowledging that there is a core of dominance and submission in almost every wife, husband, and domestic discipline relationship, no matter how much those terms make many of us uncomfortable in thinking they might describe our "overall" character and personality, rather than our smaller, more context-specific orientations.
All that said, I have sometimes wondered if, by using such explicit D/s references, Aunt Kay might have "squicked" some women and wives who consider such terms and activities incompatible with their self-images. That her repeated usage of these terms, rather than more dedicated terms compatible with DD, might have inhibited some wives and husbands from ever exploring Aunt Kay's version of Domestic Discipline. (There are numerous examples, and actual surveys, of wives from various FLR websites that establish the vast majority of wives who might be open to an FLR or DD relationship are VERY turned-off by concepts of they being expressly "dominant" (or a "Domme"), their husbands being a "submissive" (or a "sub"), or ever participating in some type of Master/slave relationship. Then again, there are many wives (and husbands) who themselves are a "squicked" by their preconceptions of what "Maternal Disciplinary Relations" (or even DD) might entail with their spouse [e.g., Wife: "I don't want to be your mother!")
Just my general observations and thoughts on what exists on the DWC website, and how it might have interacted and influenced the website's millions of visitors over the decades.
I'm totally open to hearing and learning other perspectives and possible interpretations.
I think it's fair to say that it isn't totally clear the extent to which she saw DD and D/s as wholly separate, though I think, based on the disclaimer about what the DWC was and wasn't that she saw DD as very different from S&M and Master-slave arrangements. I also think that there are elements of the DWC pamphlets that had some pretty distinctive D/s vibes.
PadamI think people also don't always get that the DWC was a collaborative effort, so it may be that different voices are in different sections. Also, while it never comes up on the website or the materials except kind of by inference, the spanking aspect of their relationship was something Jerry initiated, not Kay, and at first it wasn't DD. He had been into spanking and, while they were dating, invited her to a Shadow Lane party. Sometime after that, he was planning to do something that could have gotten him into some legal trouble, she got furious about it and gave him a "real" spanking, and it was off to the races from there. When I say that him initiating the spanking relationship is kind of in the DWC by inference, I'm referring to the fact that both the website and the pamphlets do seem to presume that it is usually the man who asks for the relationship.
I do suspect that one big reason for minimizing the D/s elements is she didn't want to attract the Femdom crowd because she knew many "vanilla" wives would be turned off by the whole leather and chains scene. Al has also said several times that she was very adamant about banning any expressly sexual discussions, which kind of implicitly rules out a lot of BDSM and Femdom material. But, you're right that some of those same women might be turned off by express references to a "maternal" dynamic.
Dan,
BalasPadamNews on the home front: my wife has agreed to go for it. She said she is going to come up with rules to stop things that irritate her...I had no idea I ever irritated her. She said she would give me a warning, but I told her that I thought, in the beginning, it would be better if there was no warning. I instantly took my comment back because I realized that I was topping from the bottom, and if I wanted this to work, she had to have total control. I should ease back and see where she takes this. I in no way shape or form like getting my ass beat; however, the dichotomy is that this lifestyle is all I have ever wanted. I am as nervous as a long-tailed tomcat in a room full of rocking chairs. Hopefully I live to regret this...lol!
Sounds like a great restart on both of your parts: Staring small, having open face-to face communications, truly letting her lead, and ensuring she is empowered to use DD to better her own life-experience.
Padam"I had no idea I ever irritated her." It's funny, but after Anne and I agreed she'd start being more strict on things she found irritating, I learned there are all sorts of things I do that she finds irritating that I didn't know about before.
PadamI personally don't like the whole concept of "topping from the bottom" as applied to DD, as I think it gets in the way of effective communications. My personal view is it's an import from BDSM that shouldn't carry much weight in DD, but I know others believe in it.
Dan,
PadamFor me it's about giving up control. I guess that helps me understand her point.
Makes sense as long as it's a personal choice and not because some BDSM-er said that voicing a preference or making an observation about what isn't working or might work better said that was "topping from the bottom".
PadamCongratulations David! And I agree letting Her find Her own way is good. I also agree with Dan though that DD/FLR is different and sometimes the initiator needs to provide input on when to Discipline and how and how long. In my experience Lauren was very reluctant and when She did agree She had no idea what a really hard punishment spanking entailed. It was a rocky first few months for Her to get past pain, howling, marking. She doesn’t have a mean bone in Her body and really does not want to hurt me. However, over time She realized how much it helped me to become a better person and better husband for Her. She got used to the experience and also was amazed how fast my bottom heals. She realized She was helping me and us and that it would not cause any lasting damage, but instead would lead to a more harmonious life for both of us. This doesn’t happen without giving input from both sides. Take it slow. Take your cues from Her. Let Her know that you will let her know if She has caused any real injury and call a stop…Not a safe word, but just an agreement that if it feels like a real injury has occurred you will let Her know. Good luck!!!
PadamOdd that I have seen a more ardent attempt at discussion on this topic as I believe that we in FLRs can relate so affirmatively to this type of discipline from our significant others. I feeel the way you do Dan, Maternal and matter of fact have a distinct appeal.
BalasPadamMatter of fact is definitely a style that works for me.
PadamDan,
BalasPadamSo yesterday was my 64th birthday, and my wife had me hold onto the counter and gave me my birthday spanking. However, this spanking was harder than any other birthday spanking she has given me, it was as if she was showing me that spankings really hurt and I might want to reconsider my discipline requests. Let me tell you, that while that spanking was happening, there were many reconsiderations going through my mind. I have never had a true punishment spanking, but it is all I have ever fantasized about. I am going to stay the course, and take what is given me, because, in the end, it is all I have ever wanted. Please tell me how to make it through a real spanking.
Interesting development. Sorry, but there's not a lot of advice I can give on making it through a real spanking. Not matter what I say about it, it's an experience that can't really be described. And, I think most would say it's not really about "making it through" but, rather, giving in and surrendering to it. Easier said than done . . .
PadamHappy Friday everyone. It's about as dead as dead can be here, but that's a somewhat good thing for me, as I'll be out adventuring all weekend and mostly off-grid. It is very unlikely that I'm going to be on-line to release any comments that Blogger deems as spam, so I'll take care of any of those sometime last Sunday or early Monday.
BalasPadam